Today while proceeding peacefully from Trout Lake I was accosted by the same police officers who arrested me on the 11th (see link in the title of this post). It was under false pretense that I was chased down to "test the buds" in my hat to see if they were real. They never mentioned a warrant against my former person KK and they knew full well from having confiscated my other crown on the 11th that these buds were not real. This incident was witnessed by a friend on his property.
I think I will charge them with harassment on Monday.
Why would anyone submit to a blatantly violent criminal organization?
Public servant refusing to deliver property
337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 297.
There is no valid lawful reason for the federal crown to withhold the camcorder from Robin! He had demanded it and the Federal Crown in conjunction with the VPD have committed a criminal offense. This evidence of the willingness of the government agents top subvert the rule of law gives me the right to keep myself safe via lawful excuse from these violent criminals as a matter of survival.
I am willing to swear before my God that I believe the evidence shows that the government of Canada is out to harm me, therefor I have the duty to my life to keep myself safe and am confident that any Judge before which I might come will agree with me.
Thoughts on Marc Emery's last rally before he begins to serve his American Jail sentence
Below is a CBC Radio interview about the success of Portugal's drug policy
From CBC News article in Title Link
Rahim Jaffer, the former Edmonton MP and National Caucus Chair for the Conservative Party, faces impaired driving and drug charges after an incident early last Friday.
Jaffer was elected as a Reform MP in 1997, in the riding of Edmonton-Strathcona. He lost his seat in the last federal election to NDP MP Linda Duncan. Jaffer is married to Helena Guergis, the Minister of State for the Status of Women.
The Ontario Provincial Police in Caledon, Ontario confirmed the news today in a release, excerpted below:
On Friday September 11, 2009 at 12:45am a Caledon OPP officer on general patrol on Regional Road 50 observed a grey Ford Escape travelling northbound at a high rate of speed through the village of Palgrave.
The officer conducted a traffic stop of the vehicle and after detecting the odour of alcohol on the drivers breath an investigation was conducted.
Thirty-seven year old Rahim JAFFER of Angus was charged with Drive Motor Vehicle Over 80 milligrams of alcohol contrary to section 253(1)(b) Criminal Code of Canada and Possession of a Controlled Substance (Cocaine) contrary to section 4(1) Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
JAFFER will be making his first appearance in Orangeville Criminal Court on October 19, 2009. His licence was suspended for a period of 90 days under the Administrative Drivers Licence Suspension (ADLS) program.
Why don't these guys get drug tests at work? Including alcohol. If these people are impaired how would Canadians hope to get good policies which spend their taxes wisely? how do we know that he doesn't share his cocaine at home? Why do these people support drug pushers yet pretend that they are so hard on crime? Do they have friends in the crime business for whom they will do political favors for drugs.?
Would the drug cartels not want the prohibition policies to be hardso that their product remains lucrative?Why does Harper surround himself with criminals? Brian Mulroney, Rahim Jaffer. Such losers as Maxime Bernier? Is he such a poor judge of character? Should all politicians who make important laws not be drug tested to understand who might be co opted by their addictions to promote a policy beneficial to their suppliers?
My day started off with another liar calling me. Sgt Jeff Rice, of the Professional Standards Gang, a fixer for crooked cops, complained about receiving so many emails about my Camcorder. When he went away he assured me that there should be a release by the Crown Attorney as he saw no need to hold the camera. That was nearly 3 weeks ago. Still no camera. WTF is the problem?
I then phoned the Crown Attorney's office, and got in touch with Jessica Lawn (I kid you not) She may have law in her name but there isn't a glimmer of honest justice to her. I was assure she would review the files and get in touch with me. I called again in the afternoon and was assured that I would be hearing from her today. Still nothing at 6 PM.
This is another blatant example of there being no Rule of Law in Canada.
There is absolutely not one single reason to legally withhold my camcorder. It was not used in the commission of any crime except as a recording of the assault on myself and the camera operator. It was in the possession of that operator when the police arrested him on false allegations and later released him without charges.
The police copied the video and should have left the original video on the camera as it is evidence of an assault on us. Why is that camera still not in my friends possession? Under what pretext are they keeping his lawful property?
Why is crime by the Crown/government and police never a crime in Canada?
BC is the only province without civilian oversight of internal criminal investigations. The VPD has deservedly earned itself a reputation of being a criminal organization with several murders under its belt. How could I even hope for a fair investigation into the assault perpetrated upon me by the jailers?
Jeff Rice is already trying to shift the blame of the assault onto me. He hasn't even seen the video footage and he wants to interview me? What a joke this process is. A pile of criminal bullshit masquerading as law and order.
by Robert Menard » Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:26 pm Reposted here by Bud the Oracle who appreciates any and all constructive input and will evaluate it and use whatever i can in my situation.
Hi all, Don't know if you know who Bud Oracle is, but he claims Freeman status and is charged with selling herb. I have looked at what he is facing, and although I would not have done the same things, and would have prepared myself much better, I do applaud his courage and drive and think he deserves our support and assistance. Tio that end I have developed the following, and will be posting it on various forums he is known to visit, and if he takes the suggestions he may come out of this well on top.
Buds Defence
They will try to get you to argue about what your rights are and are not. Do not go there. It is not up for debate and can get you tied up endlessly. The argument you can win and which they do not want to fight is the one concerning the colour of right.
Did you honestly believe you had the right and was it a result not of negligence but of due diligence? Was that belief reasonable to an average man, with the same information?
You must realize that this fight is about perception and control, and the perception of control of the control of perception. You will win by fighting their control of the perception of control, if that makes any sense. By changing the publics perception of governmental control, you win. The good news is you can do things those in the government cannot, such as your WebTV and blogs and public actions.
You must find the door they do not want opened and then demand it be opened for your defense. There is something they are fearful of, and it is easy to see if you look at what they use to try and make you feel fear, anger or shame. They will try to get you to agree to argue about what your rights are and you will lose if you allow any man that power. It should not be up to debate in that court, as if the judge rules on what your rights are, and you did not grant him that power, you have lost your power to determine your own rights. It will be very tempting to argue about what your rights are and are not, but only ego will speak there and you will lose. You can't go through them, you need to deek them out, and be wise and gentle, not loud and pokey.
If you argue about what your rights are they will have you on the ropes. If you argue about what you thought your rights were, you can dance around them.
The defence you must aim for is called 'colour of right'. You will have to establish three things. 1- You honestly believed you had the right to do what you were doing. 2- This belief is not a result of negligence, but of diligence and positive action. 3- It is reasonable.
This is where the process will come in very handy. If you have done it properly, you will have a Courtesy Letter and the NUI and COR along with evidence of service and lack of response on their part.
These provide proof of your beliefs, that you expressed them, invited discussion and negotiation and was refused and then acted accordingly. This is all lawful and just. It also demonstrates action on your part, and not negligence. Thus the first two are established and it is the third that will send them running. Is it reasonable.
Now there are naysayers who will refuse to examine that aspect, and rely instead on a judges interpretation. However it will not be their opinion that matters, nor will you leave it up to the judge to decide if your beliefs are reasonable. You can bring witnesses to explain these beliefs, and if asked I would consider it a duty to stand and speak the truth.
You will rely on your community of Freemen and your fellow Canadians.
At this point you can ask they open the door they really want kept closed. Ask how many people have in fact made the same claims. On the record demand the government disclose just how many people out there feel as you do and have served NUI and CORs on the government. Hundreds? Thousands? How many is required for it to be deemed reasonable, and would that number grow if others knew of its existence?
Open that door and the public becomes aware of its existence, and the flood begins. They do not want that information disclosed. Their action against you is in part to silence you and discredit the movement, not only to enforce what they see as just law. If you argue your rights, you will end up in endless and unprofitable conflict and you may end up granting the power to decide your rights to another. Do not do that. Arguing about what you honestly thought your rights are, without arguing what your rights are, will bring you to the place where you can claim colour of right, if you establish that you acted diligently and your beliefs are reasonable to others in your community. This is where you can open that door they so dearly want kept closed and ignored. Force them to reveal just how many have made similar claims, and your actions and beliefs become reasonable and righteous and defended by colour of right.
This however will not alone ensure your success. You will also have to show spiritual and emotional growth. Imagine this was a computer game. Remember how when you met the Judge you felt they had acted with honour and respect? Imagine they gave you a small seed. If when you return you do not have that you will lose. What you should do is plant it, grow it, get more and when you return, you should have grown a field, collected a bushel and made a cake for them. What he did was simply grant you dignity as one human being to another. Felt good eh? Now do that with all the cops you meet, the people you talk to, even your detractors, bring that energy to bear in your interactions, and correspondence.
Also, you cannot never ever corner your opponent. And that is just what you have done. You must leave them an out, and allow them to save face. Your goal should not be their destruction, but their agreement, with their destruction assured if they fail to agree. You will have to find a path that allows all that, and it may seem like you are backing down, but all you are doing is demonstrating reasonableness and a desire for peaceful coexistence. You could agree for instance to not sell publicly anymore, and to do so only from the privacy of an office or cafe established for that purpose. I am willing to bet, that if you win the court battle by establishing you acted with colour of right, you would have little difficulty finding investors for your cafe. take careful steps, freeman bernard: clan mcmahon _________________________ god is my judge
Bud's free, on the land, living his life as he sees fit. It would have been interesting to see how they would've treated Bud had he not been beaten and threatened with indefinite imprisonment if he refused to sign an undertaking to appear for his former person---by the way, on these forms, the name of the person is listed as follows:
"Re/Objet Surname." That thing is not Bud the Oracle, not in my view.
As for "unsubstantiated claims", well, I could give an argument as to how "to substantiate" is "to understand", but I'll just assert it. Thus, the claims are "not understood"---tell us something we don't know =]
"...and Fred, you are misleading people, selling a product which clearly has never had a successful test drive but is none the less touted as working."
Presuming Fred were selling membership within the WFS, which he doesn't seem to me to be doing, that would not be a product so much as a service; the argument is, roughly, that the governmental (steering) services of Canada are not to the liking of many, and, therefore, they ought to have the option of being listed with a different governmental (steering) service provider. No one is suggesting that there is not a duty to have some sort of governmental service provider---merely that there is some degree of choice.
The argument may be drawn thusly:
(0) Immutable/Natural/Divine Rules: (I) Thou shalt not murder. (II) Thou shalt not steal. (III) Thou shalt not covet. (IV) Thou shalt not bear false witness of the law. Whether grounded in Holy Writ or in one's own emotional acceptance of these precepts or otherwise, these are not disagreed upon by any reasonable person.
(1) Jus/Lex Gentium (Right/Law of Man): "It was by virtue of this jus gentium that wars were introduced (that is, when declared by the prince for the defence of his country or to repel an attack) and nations separated, kingdoms established and rights of ownership distinguished. Individual ownership was not effected de novo by the jus gentium but existed of old, for in the Old Testament things were already mine and thine, theft was prohibited and it was decreed that one not retain his servant's wages. By the jus gentium boundaries were set to holdings, buildings erected next to one another, from which cities, boroughs and vills were formed. And generally, the jus gentium is the source of all contracts and of many other things." (Bracton)
"Manumission is the giving of liberty, that is, the revelation of liberty, according to some, for liberty, which proceeds from the law of nature, cannot be taken away by the jus gentium but only obscured by it, for natural rights are immutable." (Bracton)
Thus, many buildings, both on land and on paper do obscure our liberty and immutable natural rights. Further, these rights are not contained in any charter, as "all jura are incorporeal and cannot be seen" (Bracton). As rights cannot be seen, then, where do we find them? The Judge Henry of Bracton reports that "virtues and jura exist in the soul." Thus, by implication, souls exist and insofar as men have jura, or rights, they must have souls, as rights exist in the soul---no soul = no rights.
This brings us to a curious predicament, however, regarding corporations, for, as Edward Coke observes, "a corporation...has no soul." (10 Rep. 32). Thus, if a corporation has no soul, it has not the thing in which jura reside.
Then how does one come to be member of a corporation? As a corporation is soulless, it has no jura; and, therefore, any right it suggests that it has over an individual must be given it by that individual. I take this to be what "denial of consent" is all about---one refuses to give his own jura to a soulless artificial person.
(2) Exopolitics
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it." --Alan Kay
"Roundhousekick, you are a simpleton that is being misled." --chrisbennett.
Ah, so anyone who believes in immediate exopolitical change is either a simpleton being misled or a huckster selling snake oil to the simpletons. It is misleading to suggest that change may happen overnight; the only change possible is incrementally enacted through a loaded process of dialogue between the oppressors, who hold all/most of the cards, and the oppressed, whose last, best hope for peace is to shame the oppressors into giving up some of their cards---for example, the lovely piece of card paper upon which The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act is drafted.
"A true intellectual doesn’t preach the religion of gradual change but instead steps out of the mental framework of privilege to defend those on the other side. A true intellectual helps the other side develop the tools it needs and does not participate in neutralizing defiance." --Prof. Denis Rancourt, "My contention is, all kids have tremendous talents. And we squander them, pretty ruthlessly. So I want to talk about education and I want to talk about creativity. My contention is that creativity now is as important in education as literacy, and we should treat it with the same status. (Applause) Thank you. That was it, by the way. Thank you very much. (Laughter) So, 15 minutes left. Well, I was born -- no. (Laughter)
I heard a great story recently -- I love telling it -- of a little girl who was in a drawing lesson. She was six and she was at the back, drawing, and the teacher said this little girl hardly ever paid attention, and in this drawing lesson she did. The teacher was fascinated and she went over to her and she said, "What are you drawing?" And the girl said, "I'm drawing a picture of God." And the teacher said, "But nobody knows what God looks like." And the girl said, "They will in a minute."" http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html
Thus, the literary status quo after the introduction of Wars is quite possibly of some importance, but it is certainly inappropriate to use the literary status quo as ground for neutralization of creative defiance thereof.
The problem goes deep---the simpleton is being misled; misled? Is he an animal, being pulled by a cord down some path, or is he making his own decisions? Again, the language used to critique this stuff speaks quite a bit of the set of the critics of creative defiance.
I've worked with Rob Menard for several years now, helped him produce his first couple of documentaries (Bursting Bubbles, Magnificent Deception), and i run the http://ThinkFree.ca website.
So i feel qualified to add my thoughts to this discourse.
Learn or Don't. That appears to be your choice, right? We all know the police & court system is corrupt. We all know the banks are corrupt. We all know the government is mostly corrupt. We know the system is seriously messed up.
Rob Menard (and MANY others before him), have simply removed their emotions from their research, and realized how the Courts, Banks and Government work TOGETHER to put us literally into a Matrix of Control. They've deconstructed how it works. I've gotten confirmation of SO very much of this information, simply by reading different Acts and Statutes, the Uniform Commercial Code, Bills of Exchange Act, as well as experienced BEING TO COURT and seeing charges dismissed because someone stood on their Sovereignty.
Being a Freeman-On-The-Land is not the ONLY choice. There are many solutions IN and OUT of Commerce, but they require you to file correct paperwork, in a correct fashion.
Rob Menard doesn't want to lead anyone. He was wronged by the system, so he decided to learn how the system works so he wouldn't be wronged again. He works independent of if people like him or his work or not. If people want to join him in his pursuits, and stand beside him and others, in actually TAKING ACTION to declare our Rights and our Sovereignty, then that's awesome...
It's WAYYY easier to sit at home, sit at a computer, or watch TV and call people crazy or call us whackos, or take the position, "Show me the proof what you're saying works for sure 100%", or "I'm going to sit here and twiddle my thumbs until someone explains this whole Freeman thing to me", without having done any meaningful research.
However, i can agree if someone says, "It appears there might be some risks involved in blindly executing some of this Law Technology, so i will reserve judgment, learn what i can, and apply it where appropriate in my life, if i deem it appropriate at all. In the mean time, i can ask questions of my fellow man, including other people in this movement, "real" lawyers, politicians, and other officials in authority."
Most of the time, Questions don't cost anything, and carry very low risk in asking (unless you ask Questions like a smug asshole - that won't win you any friends). The biggest thing i learned from Rob Menard is that in asking questions, be respectful, communicate human-to-human, calm, even appreciative of the persons time, even if they try and intimidate you. Show no fear or anger, which takes THEIR emotional power away. This disarms the usual authoritative triggered response of Fight or Flight, where they club and arrest you, or run away from you.
Rob also taught me that when your Questions, Notices, Claims and Declarations are sent Respectfully & Correctly via paperwork, and are Notarized, and sent via Registered Mail, they have enormous Lawful and Legal weight. (you may want to learn the HUGE difference between Legal and Lawful, by the way)
How about you do your due diligence, and LEARN some of this stuff for your self? Lawyers (and Doctors) have to go to school for 7 years or more - why? Not because learning Law is so hard. Just take some sample LSAT exams and you'll see its all about logic, reason, and recognizing details and deception. It won't take anywhere near 7 years. Try 7 months of solid learning... 7 years is so that a certain mentality of conditioning can be set in. People knew all this stuff back in the late 1800's, before Lawyers held so much power. I wonder why?
Now Lawyers are taught that Law is essentially "black word magic" used by the "enlightened" (The Law Society) to control the ignorant who are considered "functionally illiterate" at best. If we try to fight them with their words, they say we don't belong to their Law Society, so we can't use their words, but they still try and use their words against us.
It's like a bully comes up to you with a knife threatening you, and so you pull out a larger knife in defense, so he says, "No Fair! You don't know how to use that knife!" and tries to order you not to use it in the fight, but of course, he insists on keeping his own knife, and using it to intimidate you. How is this even remotely fair? Then why go to court under their terms?
If we don't know what words mean (in Legalese especially), then how can we communicate effectively? The people who write Acts & Statutes (and their associate Word Definitions) KNOW that 99% of us will never read the Acts or Statutes (hell, most of the politicians don't even read them), which gives them ENORMOUS control, simply because they can assert it, and WE CAPITULATE. But why do we? Is it just that we don't understand? Are we conditioned to not understand? What if we break that conditioning, and undo their ever encroaching Police State Matrix?
If we look for someone to blame, we can only blame ourselves for becoming lazy and allowing this rise up around us, and we can only look to ourselves, to each of our individual selves, to find remedy. To find solutions...
Not in Menard, not in any leader, but in our own hearts and minds. Freedom is not something you apply for, or ask permission to have. That's Plantation/Slave mentality. Please Realize - You are Born Free. You only have to CLAIM it. You did not choose or consent to having your parents sign your body over to the state, and create a Corporate Legal Entity called a Person with the same NAME as you. So abolish that Implied Contract. They only have authority and ownership of you, because you Tacitly Accepted (by your silence) by not SAYING NO. By Claiming your Rights, you are EFFECTIVELY SAYING NO.
This Freeman movement is about Personal Responsibility. Period. The Revolution starts within you. It starts when you lose the fear, and realize your power to do something by learning, growing and sharing your positive ideas with others, and earning mutual trust.
Lawyers are the gatekeepers of the Elite, and we've lost our trust in the whole lot of them. We are figuring out their corrupt game, and we are storming the gates. I know so many lawyers who use & support Cannabis, and yet the other lawyers who yearn for its continued prohibition, end up being the "lawmakers". The Elite know an end to Prohibition means an end to their huge poisonous profits.
Using Cannabis is our own choice, its usage doesn't harm another, and doesn't harm the user. Cannabis users should be FREE to do as they want without harming another living soul. That is the essence of the Freeman/woman movement. A large segment of the Freeman movement seem to be Cannabis users/supporters, and we're all collectively waking up to the Tyranny of our ever growing police state, and want to do something constructive.
Menard advocates filing paperwork Declaring your Rights. What is wrong with that? You do realize that if you don't declare your rights, then you HAVE NONE! You realize that a cop arresting you gives you your LIMITED rights as a LEGAL PERSON. It's a shell game, and if you can't distinguish between your Human self, and the Legal Person (Identity) you carry, then you are only playing into their game. I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT (from experience and multiple times witnessing).
If you want to read success stories, then check out the Forums of World Freeman Society, or the Think Free Forums (http://thinkfreeforums.org)
A good starting point for those new to this information might also be my first documentary film, "Hijacking Humanity" (http://HijackingHumanity.com) which deals with the Media, Banks, Law and Commerce, and False Flag Terrorism, and has interviews with Rob Menard and others discussing these subjects.
My second documentary film, "Believers Beware" comes out next month, and deals with The War on Drugs, Cannabis and Hemp, the FDA and Pharmaceuticals, Alternative Health and Remedies, Food, Nutrition and Codex Alimentarius, Astrotheology, Shamanism, and the origins of Religions, as well as Spirituality and Quantum Physics...
All this stuff is tied together, and although it requires some actual homework and study to understand, and fully understanding is an evolutionary process, it's definitely not IMPOSSIBLE to figure this all out.
Rob Menard and my self put out our educational films FREE OF CHARGE to share this empowering knowledge, not so we can profit financially, but socially and intellectually. If people want to buy DVD's and then make copies to hand out to people, we both appreciate and endorse that. This is about more than making money, but we are not businessmen like Marc Emery.
Much like Canada's Rick Simpson (who cured cancer with 80% THC Hemp Oil), i believe that Cannabis should cost the same as Corn (by the lb.), and that all forms of it (oil, hash, etc.) should be completely Lawful and Legal, so that the Profit Motive is removed from the Plant itself, anyone can grow it cheaply, and Marc Emery can still get rich selling awesome 6' bongs till he's green in the face.
The more people who are awake, aware, educated and empowered, and on our side, taking on not only the Unlawful Cannabis War, but the Unlawful Extraction of our Wealth, Invasion of Sovereign Countries with no evidence, and continued injustices at home (Police State/Judicial Corruption), then the more positive change we will see.
Cannabis use and tolerance is on the rise, only because more people are smoking, seeing the benefits, and losing the fear. As we continue to wake up, and see the Hemp plant's benefits, things will get better, but we have to be educated in ALL areas, not just Cannabis, or we will continue to be enslaved, financially, physically, and even spiritually..
It's a deep rabbit hole, and i'm not here to judge people who haven't come out the other side yet. But consider this scenerio:
You are living in a big box. Inside that box you are told that a Soulless entity will take care of you from cradle to grave, but you have to sign over your kids, give 1/4 to 1/2 of your energy in Work, pay taxes upon demand, get permission for perfectly lawful activities like driving, voting, marriage, business, with more and more things, not less and less being regulated, controlled, and forced upon you - and you tolerate it all, for a few potential "benefits".
Now imagine someone opens the top of the box, and blows a huge billow of cannabis smoke into your box, and says, you're free! So you leave the box you were in, and now, your mind is opened a little, and you realize the system is not all it's cracked up to be, but the system has decided your cannabis plant is not profitable to the system, and too empowering to the individual, so it uses your usage of the plant against you, and now you are out of the first box, but stuck in an even bigger box.
And this box may have nice blue sky and clouds painted on the inside, and it seems so real, and well, you're already out of that other box, so might as well make due with this box!
That's were most of our counter-culture is at. The 2nd box. It's bigger, it's more beautiful, but its still a box of slavery.
NOW, imagine you grow tired of the indentured servitude of the 2nd box. You feel something is still missing, even though you like that Obama is president, and you work for cash under the table to minimize tax, and can grow a small 8 light setup to make ends meet. You still feel the pressure of a Police State, forced Vaccines, Currency manipulations (inflation/devaluation), a flawed Medical System, and increased Checkpoints and Cameras with Behaviour Interpretation software. Thumbscans and Retina scans, and a Passport or Drivers license with an RFID in it. More Acts and Statutes (not Laws) go on the books to control you more and more.
Suddenly a concept falls into your lap.. Sovereignty.. People - they used to be Sovereign. You owned your own body, and had unalienable rights which NO ONE could violate, without the lawful response of violence. Everything is a contract between yourself and your fellow man/woman. Acts and Statutes apply only to PERSONS (Legal Persons) who have SIGNED AWAY THEIR RIGHTS via a Social Insurance (or Security) Number or Drivers License (Contract to Submit to Authority of Police Officers).
Suddenly you see the 2nd box for what it is, a larger box, and BAM - You see the Matrix as it really is. You've cracked the code. You're Neo. You've broken through that deeper level of understanding, and see things from a higher perspective. It takes some work to get there, but once you're there, there's no looking back.
The bottom line is, if you are happy and comfortable in your existence, don't learn about Sovereignty, your Human Rights, Legal Notices, Claims of Rights, Freemen or Persons or any of that stuff. Just keep smoking your joints until the United States and Canada are merged, and all your "progress" evaporates at the stroke of Stephen Harper's satanic pen.
OR you can REALIZE YOUR POWER. LEARN YOUR RIGHTS, DECLARE AND ESTABLISH YOUR RIGHTS.
REALIZE Acts and Statutes are Consentual - YOU NEED TO AGREE TO WAIVE YOUR RIGHTS (your Drivers License/S.I.N. are PROOF (your signature) that you have WAIVED YOUR RIGHTS as a Human Being, and WILLFULLY allow the State to become your Master, in exchange for the "Benefit" of Driving/Paying Income Taxes) BEFORE ANYONE HAS ANY AUTHORITY OVER YOU.
They say that the best kind of Slave to keep is the one who foolishly thinks he's free. We are all Debt Slaves of the Banksters System, and Acts and Statutes are their Invisible Chains.
Declare your Sovereignty if you can, but don't dump all over the people who are trying to do this themselves.. We are acting as the Guinea Pigs to see what works and what doesn't...
I believe if Marc Emery really wanted to put his nuts on the line, he would declare his Sovereignty, but in my opinion, he has too many business interests that require him to keep using his Legal Person, so he'd rather be rich and in jail, than re-organize his life, and not go to jail. He is entirely free to make whatever choice he wants, but casting insults towards a group of educated and well-meaning individuals without explaining his position clearly seems needlessly confrontational at best, and willfully ignorant at worst.
I'm sure if there was a cookie-cutter way to become "Free" and Sovereign, via a form you just fill out and send to the Government, people would probably line up like damned lemmings..
Why? Because they want justice, solutions and remedy in a Pill form, easy to take, no side effects, no research or hard work required. Do you think then you have earned your Freedom? This is the lazy approach... Freedom in a Pill - gimme a break. You were born Free, yes, but that Freedom has been taken away, and we have to earn it back through our journey of life. All of your experiences have added up to being who you are, reading this sentence. Are you YOU? Or are you a NAME that someone CALLS you? Does that question offend you? If so, then WHY?
It's far easier to pooh-pooh us as we work to find REAL solutions and remedies by testing this Law Technology in Courts, via Registered Mail, with Notary Publics, and via making videos to educate people of our findings, mistakes, failures and successes.
Dismiss this all if you wish, based on your emotions, or a few zealous people who failed because they didn't know what they were doing, but that is only your ego letting you off the hook from actually taking personal responsibility by creating a Rationalization for your Cynicism.
Some people would rather be Correct 100% of the time, than be happy. I prefer to learn from my mistakes, grow from that learning experience, and move on, appreciating i'm stronger and smarter for having learned.
Marc Emery can call people anything he wants. That doesn't change the fact that if he had Declared his Rights, become a Sovereign, and fought this Unlawful Extradition on Jurisdictional grounds, he WOULD HAVE WON.
My good friend James-Crawford of the Craig family, used Menard's and others Law Technology (including Winston Shrout), and we documented ON VIDEO, his entire process, including when the Charges were DISMISSED, and he WON.
Check out our videos at http://youtube.com/huskavarna
There's lots of great videos on my Channel to give you an introductory idea of how all this Law stuff works...
The rest, is up to you figure out. But the answers, and the Truth, are out there, you just have to be tenacious enough to find them.
You can watch my first film, "Hijacking Humanity" for FREE at http://HijackingHumanity.com
The trailer for my second film, "Believers Beware" is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwNQNuyBWlg
And remember, there's more than just Menard talking an teaching about this!
Check out John Harris, Winston Shrout, and many others with Videos on-line for FREE!
I sincerely hope everything works out positively for Marc Emery and his co-accused, and that they beat this thing, but i would also hope that he would see the pointlessness in berating and alienating a growing movement of conscious and concerned people who are on his side, trying to help, and want almost the exact same things he appears to want from society, except we're taking the power back from the De Facto Courts, and putting it back in our Lawful hands. Lawful hands open to those willing to take the journey, and the responsibility.
Truth is First Ignored and Insulted, and Second, it is Violently Opposed, but then Third, it is Accepted as Self-Evident. Such are the inevitable 3 Stages all truth must pass.
Thanks for your time in reading this long-ass letter, but thank you even more for your open mind, non-judgment & understanding.
PS. For those who learn about this stuff, and learn about the Birth Certificate, and its attached Bond # - Please realize that the Account linked to your Birth Certificate Bond is there to OFFSET Debts in your NAME, not be some kind of unlimited bank account for you to get a house, car and boat with little to no work. The books have to be balanced, so get any greedy ideas out of your head. Redemption Schemes may exist, but usually they are just Schemes asking for money up front! Beware of those people who get into this movement or Teach other people in this movement that they can use this Law Technology to access unlimited money or credit, and have "all their dreams come true", are doing it for ALL THE WRONG REASONS.
In the end, Like Trey Parker sings, "Freedom Isn't Free." It costs your time and energy to Claim and Maintain. It's a mutual energy exchange. You can't get something for nothing.
Robert Menard asks you read section 38 and 39 of the Criminal Code and then read Sections 126 and 127. The first deals with operating with a claim of right and how it establishes lawful excuse. The second set deals with how we have the power to disobey courts and governments if we have a lawful excuse, such as a claim of right.
Defence of personal property
38. (1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property, and every one lawfully assisting him, is justified
(a) in preventing a trespasser from taking it, or
(b) in taking it from a trespasser who has taken it,
if he does not strike or cause bodily harm to the trespasser.
Assault by trespasser
(2) Where a person who is in peaceable possession of personal property lays hands on it, a trespasser who persists in attempting to keep it or take it from him or from any one lawfully assisting him shall be deemed to commit an assault without justification or provocation.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 38. Is this not what the VPD are guilty of when they took my rightful possessions?
Defence with claim of right
39. (1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property under a claim of right, and every one acting under his authority, is protected from criminal responsibility for defending that possession, even against a person entitled by law to possession of it, if he uses no more force than is necessary.
Defence without claim of right
(2) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property, but does not claim it as of right or does not act under the authority of a person who claims it as of right, is not justified or protected from criminal responsibility for defending his possession against a person who is entitled by law to possession of it.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 39.
This is my personal Lawful Excuse, My claim of right.
Disobeying a statute
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
Attorney General of Canada may act
(2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
Disobeying order of court
127. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, disobeys a lawful order made by a court of justice or by a person or body of persons authorized by any Act to make or give the order, other than an order for the payment of money, is, unless a punishment or other mode of proceeding is expressly provided by law, guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Attorney General of Canada may act
(2) Where the order referred to in subsection (1) was made in proceedings instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that Government, any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene that order may be instituted and conducted in like manner.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 127; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F); 2005, c. 32, s. 1.
The involvement in the aftermath of the murder of 4 RCMP near Mayerthorpe Alberta in March 2005. I caught the government of Canada perpetrating a hate crime breaking the rule of law
14 years after doing the mounties a favor and turning in a double murderer who bragged of his deed to me, the RCMP used that good deed against me to dissuade me from holding another off duty cop, who ran into the night to after her Rottweiler mauled my dog and myself leaving me calling for help, to account
Casey Hardison is currently serving a 20 year sentence in the UK for the manufacture of LSD, DMT and 2-CB. Casey defended himself using complex and innovative human rights arguments and continues to challenge the legality of the administration of the Misuse of Drugs Act:
Please don't forget to give to Casey's cause.
The very solid argument belongs to all, was first developed by Casey William Hardison and the legal foundation in search of Justice for Casey: Drug Equality Alliance
These guys at the "DEA" are true activists. Although I may be a recipient (indirectly) of their generosity mostly in 'SITTING IN' on the discussion format, I am honestly astonished at the level of commitment- let me spell that out- unpaid time and effort, that this organization has given to the cause of our freedom.
Remember this spending of a few bucks on your part could pay off in YOU gaining your freedom! Please find their donate button and spend freely. Here is the new battle cry.... Smoke one gram less per week and send $10 to the cause of this wonderful organization or Free Casey cause! No one OVER there is DIRECTLY concerned with Bud the "silly" Oracle, or, Klaus Kaczor and his gang of "demented" men, it is all about getting their wonderful perception of the law in front of a court anywhere in the western world. You too are welcome to contact them and state your case.That, in today's world, is far from the norm.
Bud Oracle
For Official Election Profile click the photo
Why donate to Bud?
I am still carrying on this battle for sanity. I spend much time on the issues, and I hope to bring this case further than just the sentence hearing on September 2. If I can, I will ask to be heard at the Supreme Court level to get a stay in the proceedings on the much same argument I put before the Provincial court (See the bottom of this post.) To this end I hope to be able to raise airfare for an advocate from the Drug Equality Alliance to stand up and present the argument free of charge. The chances are not all that great, but we are working at the documentation to be heard at the Supreme Court level all by our amateur selves. It is our hope that we might get this argument before the courts somewhere in the world to raise the spirits and chances for freedom for Casey William Hardison who is still serving out his 20 year sentence. I don't know about you, but I can't just sit on my ass and dream about the times I used to get high, when this man and so many others are being tormented in prison for their belief in human rights. There is a strong likelihood that I too may be returned to jail at the time of sentencing but whatever it might be is nothing to the amount of time others are doing for supplying you with some nice psychedelic adventures to practice your freedom.
Podcasts of Bud's best contributions to our society
Posts
