This is the society, these are the people, government and economy Harper has been touting as his ideal model since he came on the scene. It is our neighbor's full prisons, crime ridden lawless society Harper sees as the template for Canada. Harsher laws for your children, three times and your out for life.When is Harper going to establish the rule of Law in Canada? With the example of always being above the laws which they harshly enforce, the Canadian police forces have racked up the largest score of collateral damage (dead Canadian citizens and one Pole) while "doing their job" of all the other illegal gangs combined. Lies, negligent investigations, have caused many travesties of Justice. Natives are still targeted in vestigial racism.
Former Judge Henderson arrested in the Cayman Islands in a police corruption investigation. I wonder if more of our Judges aren't secret criminals. Like that one in Northern BC, who was found guilty of raping a minor. The same minor who had charged a Mounty before she died.This rapist cop, knowing that she can not stand against him now, is suing the Police themselves for charging him. Are these only hints of what slime lies deeply within our justice system? The model we have is of the law of the jungle, not, justice as in the rule of law.
The American lies are collapsing to the south, yet Harper stands by them. As if Canada's puny economic engine, which is intertwined with the American business cancer, could stave off what is in store for us.
This autocratic emulator of the Great Decider and his republican dream team, Harper, has shown himself to be a sucker betting on a loosing American horse. Don't be misled by his claims and words, look close at his failed deeds, his inability to work with your elected representatives.
To elect Harper, a Republican conservative boot-licker now, when America itself is rejecting his ilk, would put Canada behind their recovery.
We pay for non performance and corporate welfare, while there are many needy Canadians being left to suffer. The corporate greedy slugs take our money and never give back the industry promised to us in payment for the tax incentives given, to employ the poor and needy, to enhance the Canadian economy.
Some Canadians are bovine to believe the the likes of the conservatives will help them in the coming economic failure. They will stick money and tax incentives up their friend's anal orifices, while making the average Canadian carry the brunt of the hardship.
These "Market Adjustments" really mean "wealth claw-back" from the poor. Those who have caused this meltdown knew enough to be cash rich and get more from government to buy up all the deals due to devaluation of your property, which they caused.
Wait and see, the rich are getting richer, and will be able to get even more so, with the likes of the Conservatives in Government.
Posts
1 comment:
I'm fairly computer impaired so I'm responding to your comment on my page wherever.
Here's the thing. There is no discourse going on Global Warming. That is ridiculous, there are always multiple sides to an issue.
Al Gore basically said that it is okay to lie about it:
"In the United States of America, unfortunately we still live in a bubble of unreality. And the Category 5 denial is an enormous obstacle to any discussion of solutions. Nobody is interested in solutions if they don't think there's a problem. Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous (global warming) is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis."
(Here is an interesting scenario of that. George Bush felt it was important to go into Iraq. Just as Al Gore feels global warming is an important issue. So you could say Bush "over-represent[ed] factual presentations" of the Iraq situation. And that was wrong. Why is it not wrong when Al Gore does it?)
Whenever a scientist does try to come out with evidence that is contradictory to the accepted global warming doctrine, they are called a heretic. There are plenty of people out there trying to speak out and not getting any attention.
There is a multitude of evidence out there right now that suggests global warming is something we have not control over. Sure we affect our environment and sure we should try to negatively affect it to a minimum. But it is egotistical to think we can control the weather.
Plus I've been reading recently that solar flares may be responsible for the CYCLE of global warming. See this article, sorry if it isn't hyperlinked.
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/642-2.html
But maybe they're not. I don't know. But there has been a recent drop in temperature lately, corresponding with the decrease in solar flares.
Look, I'm not an expert, or a genius, and I certainly don't know a great deal about these sciences.
But I do try to be reasonable. And when I read that just thirty years ago most of the SAME environmentalists were suggesting we intentionally melt the polar ice caps with ash because global cooling was going to kill us all, forgive me if I am slightly leery of their "certainty" about the issue.
Look, I'm not going to change how you feel ever and there it is likely you will not change my opinion, though I am open to reading opposing points of view. When I find something I can't argue against reasonably, perhaps it will change my mind. Heck, I agreed with Barrack Obama on a situation the other day, so I guess anything is possible!
Post a Comment