The idiocy of prohibition caused this man to choke to death

I hope you don't think that fear will govern me to do something like this man did to escape being busted. I'll be facked if I will ever submit to goons checking my diet again, Michael De Jong, and if you don't keep them out of my face, I will hold you personally responsible. There are no conditions on me or my former person. Therefore if another goon comes over to Judo chop me without identifying himself as a cop he will be countered effectively.

I will be exercising my right to consume vegetables peacefully and your agents can fack right off.



I'll be facked if I ever submit to your double crossing crooked violent cops again, Canada.


I have much first hand proof of Canada being a criminal organization in regards to its treatment of me. There is no rule of law in Canada.


And in Vancouver here I have also done my duty to my community. They had to pervert the law twice to let this slug of a police chief stay in office. Who really gives a shit if cops are allowed to become Judge, jury and executioner? The sheep mumble once in a while when a video hits them with the hard facts but not many of them care enough to put out an effort to change it.
These words can be found in the record of your parliament which recognized me as Chief Justice Bud the Oracle.

This who I am as introduced by Ed Fast at the 17th meeting of the justice committee of the 40th Parliament of Canada:

We also have two individuals representing the Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society, Mr. Robin Wroe and Chief Justice Bud the Oracle.

And this is what we said. We meant every word:

Bud the Oracle (As an Individual):
Mr. Chairman, I am Bud the Oracle, chief justice from the Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society.

Peace to this hotel and to the House of Commons justice and human rights committee.

In summary, our society's judgment is that prohibition and your Controlled Drugs and Substances Act are failed policies that trespasses upon the peaceful possessory right that ought to be enjoyed by everyone. Your society's policy does not respect this right. You violently oppress otherwise law-abiding members of your own society. Your corporation's own policy is the organized crime.

In respect of drugs, your government's own policy is what enables the black market to flourish. Absent your corporate policy, regulated companies would supply drugs on a demand-oriented basis, similar to any other product. Your policy has alienated and will continue to alienate men and women from your society and its government.

To flesh out our view, I now turn the proceedings over to the registrar, Mr. Robin Wroe.

And


Mr. Robin Wroe (Registrar, Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society):
I am not mister; I'm just Robin.

Thank you, Chief Justice.

Our position in respect of Bill C-15 and drug prohibition in general is quite simple.

Societies such as yours or ours govern their members by the content of those members. Drug crime is not really crime at all in any necessary sense. It is quasi-crime or crime mala prohibita on a par with an act forbidding the importation of wool and not at all on a par with, for example, that divine precept forbidding murder. I would also like to add that slavery of persons is another thing that I put in much worse regard than the possession of drugs or what not, to refer to Ms. Miller's comment.

But in any case, the rhetoric about drugs singularly destroying lives is fundamentally offensive. There is a wide variety of non-destructive reasons for drug use. Many human beings use drugs because they improve their happiness or quality of life. Other human beings use drugs for production of heightened spiritual, esthetic, and interpersonal experience.

In a commentary on DOB from the book PiHKAL by Dr. Alexander Shulgin, one of the amphetamines to be rescheduled--that's DOB, for example--in a three-milligram dose the experience was described thusly:

“Wunnerful. It's been one heck of a good experiment, and I can't understand why we waited nine years to try this gorgeous stuff. Without going into the cosmic and delicious details, let's just say it's a great material and a good level.”

Why should such a thing be prohibitorially scheduled at all? Everyone has personal tastes. Some run toward automobiles, and automobile users are taken care of by regulation, and there is no reason your society should not, at worst, apply some sort of gradated licensing to drug purchase and dispensation involving training as to the calculated statistical risk involved with drug use. At best, your society would leave each to his own diet and not use blunt corporate policy instruments for dietary control.

Further, repeal of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act will redirect a revenue stream that currently pumps into organized crime. The stream will be diverted by the CDSA's repeal into legitimate, regulated companies subject to human rights law and all the other furnishings of a modern place of employment. Those legitimate companies will use law courts for dispute resolution, not guns.

Repeal of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act will remove a key revenue stream from organized crime. Continuation of the act will sustain a key revenue stream for organized crime.

Harmless men and women do not need to submit to being governed by those who seek to harm them by imprisonment. If membership in a society becomes injurious to happiness, men and women may leave that society and they may form their own society capable of its own legislative acts. Of course, they cannot legislate away gravity, nor may they depart from certain customary behaviours. However, these have little to do with possessing or not possessing any specific plants or substances.

Why should any reasonable marijuana smoker consent to being governed by a society that sustains the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act? Why should he not instead consent to government by a society that respects his peaceful transaction with his chosen supplier? If your society fails to take up the duty of regulating demand-oriented drug suppliers, should some society or societies not fill that void?

We will quote from our summary of Bill C-15, in short, just to include one part that we think is rather important. It highlights the lack of care that has gone into the drafting of Bill C-15.

As to the appending of amphetamine and its analogs to schedule 1 of the act, we wonder why you've included the brominated and chlorinated variance of 2,5 dimethoxy-4-chloroamphetamine, yet have excluded the diogenated analog 2,5 dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine. This gives us cause to question what principles were involved in the drafting of the proposed appendix to schedule 1.

+ -(0925)

To conclude our statement, prohibition is a failed corporate policy and it causes harm to members of your Canadian society. The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act is the instrument that carves out the market enjoyed by organized crime in respect of drugs. Repeal of that act would also give the benefit of freeing up your scarce judicial resources. Absent repeal, we declare that men and women may constitute their own governments respectful of their right and good custom and be done with you, and that would be a shame, for Canada is a decent idea. It is not, however, a mandatory idea.

A new variety of fine Marijuana is in stock: TASEBLAZE Bud

This excellent variety of Primo BC Bud is stunningly powerful and electrically enlightening. Over time, with prodigeous use this bud will give you enhanced perception and gold medal creative performance. You too, will be able to spot the fraud!

I have named the bud, reminiscent of Dutch Big bud in aroma and taste, TAZEBLAZE Bud, in honor of the Attorney General of British Columbia having given the order to remove the TASER WARNING signs in all secure areas of the courthouses of this province. If you wish to sample it, I will bring a joint for my 9:30am coffee break at the courthouse protest. Week/court days

It is $30.00 per 1/8 ounce plus 5% Sales tax to the Marijuana Guild.

Natives are now exempt from the tax

Toking Marijuana in front of the Provincial courts Vancouver

This is a peaceful demonstration of our right to consume our favorite herb.

I dare anyone to point out where our behavior is anything but a benefit to our community.

Where is the evidence that Marijuana makes you stupid?

Why does it take a 60 year old toker to make the Law Society of British Columbia aware of its duty to society?

Why does the government seek to harm peaceful people like us?

Did you know that Jus and Injuria are mutually exclusive?

Did you know that in terms of Anglo-Christian legal heritage, drugs simply cannot be prohibited for free individuals, for the prohibition requires theft, and theft is of injuria, not jus, and the Monarch's power is that of jus, not injuria, for jus and injuria are mutually exclusive. This is all outlined in the Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society's Charter and various Acts of Parliament.

"The king, since he is the vicar of God on earth, must distinguish jus from injuria, equity from iniquity, that all his subjects may live uprightly, none injure another, and by a just award each be restored to that which is his own."
Bracton.

"As for the words his right, they mean his merited right, for because of delict or a pact broken or the like one is [de jure] deprived of his right. Or say to each means to him, that he live virtuously, and to God, that he love God, and to his neighbour, that he not harm him. Or say suum jus' means her right, that is, [to each what justice entitles him to]; she is called justice because in her all rights reside."
Bracton.

The power of vocal protest

This group of concerned bikers was standing around very quietly being present. Until I came there was no action. The cops and sheriffs were looking bored. Once I began to shout things like "this bell (ring my tiny bell with a cross on it) tolls for Robert Dziekanski, TASERed to death by the RCMP" "This bell tolls for Ian Bush,shot in the back of the head by the RCMP" "This bell tolls for Orion Hutchison, killed by a drunk RCMP" "This bell tolls for Robert Knipstrom bludgeoned and TASERed to death by the RCMP" "This bell tolls for Kevin St. Arneau, shot to death by the RCMP" "This bell tolls for the death of Justice in Canada." the armed gang members always above the law earning a hefty wage were not looking bored.

My presence was felt!

Canadians have been trained to behave and be accepting of all the bullshit the government feeds us and remain nice. I am getting to understand why the press stays away from me like the plague. One guy eloquently smearing their own crap into their faces with a clear strong voice is way more effective than a quiet respectful crowd milling around with signs by a long shot.

There is no way to ignore a biting truth flung at you with a strong clear voice. It enters the psyche and injures the spirit if it has the ring of truth.

The silent milling about is a behavior that speaks to me of a cowed attitude, a well behaving little citizen. Come on you mice open your big mouths. Can't get loud unless you have consumed some courage in the form of alcohol and socially trained to only be loud at sporting events? Good meek, quiet Canadians easily managed by a handful of overweight sheriffs and scared trigger happy mounties looking for a stapler or dangerous sign bearer.

Come on people, if you are pissed off at something why not show it? Speak the fuck up you mealy mouthed complainers.

TASER Warning signs to be removed from BC courthouses

A reply from the Attorney general's office to my video thanks to the UDS Registrar.

"Thank you for your e-mail of November 23, 2009 addressed to the Attorney General regarding the TASER warning sign posted at the Vancouver Provincial Court house. I have been asked to respond on behalf of the Attorney General.

I appreciate your bringing this issue to the Attorney General’s attention. As a result of the Braidwood Inquiry recommendations, I have directed all sheriff offices to remove the TASER warning signs located in secure areas of British Columbia courthouses.

Yours sincerely,


Dave Maedel
Executive Director and Chief Superintendent
Sheriff Services Division, Court Services Branch
Ministry of Attorney General"

So, maybe take a peek inside to see if the sign is down, though it might
take a few days...

So who really gives a crap what the rest of you controlling types think sooner or later you will be giving me the freedom I demand. I am not harming anyone and my state of mind is my choice so you can take a flying fuck and get off my back. One thing is for sure I will not be judged by the likes of anyone who could walk by that ignorant sign for many months and claim to be trained in the law and loftily claiming like that hypocritical Judge who sentenced David Malmo Lavine, to be about the rule of law. Yeah, right you lying violent oppressor supporting fucks!

I will not be submitting to lawless tyrants who pervert justice daily, anytime soon. Especially when I risked my life on the 11th of August to make my community safe, was submitted to assault by the jail guards all so that these perverts, who are busy making my community unsafe while destroying the rule of law, can wear nice clothes. Not by a long shot.

Just letting you know what I think on the record so you can think what you like without a single twinge of guilt. Go get a couple of belts of Scotch in ya, laddy! That should settle the nerves, I know that I am a scary lookin' guy! Grain alcohol will do if you are really nervous and have nothin' else. Not too much though.

Law and the Bible

Some thoughts posted in Cannabis Culture Forums by the Registrar of the Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society. He is posting as Malaclypse IV

"So that's what you call it eh? Christian-Libertarian...where did you pick up your Christian influences from?"

Well, I've been interested in drug prohibition since I was in gradeschool and a coffee-swilling public educator tried to tell us kids about the evils of "drugs"---well, clearly some drugs are OK, you're drinking coffee...didn't go over too well.


So, fast forward to a couple of years ago. I was taking a mixture of arts courses at The University of British Columbia, including Critical Studies in Sexuality. I mention this course because it taught me that the "left", for lack of a better term, is completely shameless about justifying itself through obfuscation---essentially, say "heteronormativity" is bad, and repeat "performative", "iterated", "queer theory" enough times that people respect you and your vacuity. This led me to believe that I had been far too circumspect in my values and my tactics visavis drug prohibition; if the queers are now at a point where they basically set the script _on their own terms_ in Universities, why should that not be the goal of the drug culture?

As an example, here on these forums there are many drug users who believe in "soberonormativity," at least for children, in that they believe a sober childhood is normal/optimal/better than a high childhood. Now, to my mind, this is more or less the equivalent of trying to teach children to be accepting of queers by telling them "you know, once you're an adult, if you want to be gay, that's one thing, maybe, I guess, but, gosh, try to kiss girls if you're a boy and boys if you're a girl while you're growing up---trust us, we're older and wiser." Yeah, right.

And, totally coincidentally, at this time I was given a bible, and I began to read it. Goodness gracious does it say some hip things---and I'm not going to argue for the truth/falsity of the Scriptures; I will point out that in every courtroom of British Columbia there is a copy, and that I've heard a Judge of the Provincial Court go so far as to say that he would not contradict anything in Scripture.

So, I thought "won't contradict anything in Scripture"? Ah, well then. The charter says, pretty much, that a Court may contradict any charter right insofar as that contradiction facilitates amelioration of the condition of a historically oppressed group, so Charter rights are right out, but what about Scriptural rights, I thought?

Anyway, at this time I was also reading Fortescue's Commendation of the Laws of England which details the rights and responsibilities of the Monarch, who at the time was in exile with Fortefcue. More or less, it says therein that the book of Deuteronomy is especially important to Monarchy, as it is in Deuteronomy that all of God's commandments are most explicitely and totally recounted; that is to say, the entire Scripture is a fountain of lifegiving water, but Deuteronomy is especially instructive for rulers.

I'd also been reading some very good Coke at the time, and Coke says animals are hurtful if single, as bears and foxes, but they are not hurtful if they are social, as sheep, fish, etc. So, from that, I gathered that one is required to have some society, that is, partnership. Thus I set to draughting a charter for a society that would use Deuteronomy, which Fortescue confirms is complete, and which the Lord Chancellor Ellesmere states is part of the foundation of the common law of england by way of his statement that the common law of England's ground is the law of God.

So, it appeared, and still appears to me, that in terms of Anglo-Christian legal heritage, drugs simply cannot be prohibited for free individuals, for the prohibition requires theft, and theft is of injuria, not jus, and the Monarch's power is that of jus, not injuria, for jus and injuria are mutually exclusive. And this is all outlined in the Society's Charter and various Acts of Parliament.

At this point we are "in medias res" the refining/firing of the creation---and what I find most dreadful is the lack of imagination on the part of people. It is very sad to me that I've had more respectful dialogue on this issue with Ed Fast, Conservative MP, than with the people here who supposedly want drugs legalized. In my view, anyone who wants to do something politically helpful should stay the hell away from the Socialists in the NDP and get in with the Conservatives...

"Is that Christian as in the ridiculously distorted from of Christianity the world has known...or the universal teachings of Jesus?"

Well, presuming you're not of the "Jesus is love! Love is a hallmark card!" persuasion,

"36For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

37Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?

38Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels."
(from Mark 8)

The project really consists merely in not being ashamed of the Word of God, or holy scripture, especially the ten commandments, or Law called Moral.

"If it's the former, mixing religion and politics is a dangerous habit. I heard it leads to psychosis"

Well, considering that psychosis only exists because psychiatrists have voted it into being, I am just not so sure that anything can lead to psychosis, 'cept a duly authorized Quack being allowed to work out on some precious mind. Even though he's out of fashion, I think Szasz makes a good argument, and, no, I do not think that fancy coloured pictures of brains refute him at all. There is a fundamental epistemic problem associated with the diagnosis of mental illness, especially without the permission of the patient as is often the case for diagnoses of "psychosis." And it is generally self-fulfilling: "we do not need his permission because he is psychotic," and why is he psychotic? "He doesn't want to give us permission. He says we are cryptofascists, members of a monopolistic corporation called the College of Physicians and Surgeons. Clearly we need to pump him full of drugs until he forgets how our scam works..."

Given the responses in this thread and in general to these ideas when brought up in public, a lot of vicious laypeople of slightly above average intelligence (it's odd that less intelligent people and more intelligent people can often get it, tho the former can rarely repeat it coherently, they are good people and know they are free.) are perfectly at ease with labelling the holders of different political opinions with mental health terminology---of course, they're "reasonable persons", which is like a "reasonable man", which is taken to be "the man on the Clapham Omnibus," or someone just like them: a silly worker going to work, knowing all of the things that workers "know." Not someone dedicated to study, wisdom, etc...a mere worker, a bee for the beehive.

Now, we all know that in the Soviet Union they interred people under the guise of mental health problems for political dissent; and it is no surprise to me, for there is always a segment of the population so insecure in its views that they are only able to maintain them by coercive authority.

Reflections on "Staying alive" Fifth Estate CBC

This might be the 3rd time I have seen the gripping documentary "Staying alive" by the CBC Fifth Estate. It is very close to me in both a physical and an emotional sense. As I go forth today with the White Wolf I will ponder on the first half of it. This documentary is so laden with human hurt that I have never been able to watch it all the way through at once. I know some of these people from seeing them on the street, others I know from a resemblance to people whom I know closely.

Last night the manager made me aware that the authorities are looking for my neighbor, Robert, who has serious mental health issues and is being actively sought. They are concerned, because he is missing with the weather getting cold.

When Robert first moved in I didn't realize that he was so seriously mentally disturbed. I even sold him small amounts of pot until I began to realize that he was incompetent. It has been a very long time since I have sold him anything, though he still asks. He had gotten on into my bad books when he began to talk of violent nonsense whenever we met. He had also begun to bring crack/meth/hard drug addicts by, speaking about what I do openly as he passed .

I mean, really! I don't spend much time worrying at the worst of times (I have 911 on speed dial and the white wolf to give me a few seconds of warning, so I am confident. The last time I relied totally on the cops they ended up siding with the attacker, so this time I will not rely on them) but that got me upset. I told the former manager to get in touch with those concerned about his well being.

He has been missing for lengthy periods before, so I thought perhaps he is in jail or institutionalized. All my former dark thoughts toward him have turned into reflective empathy with a tinge of guilt. I hope he is OK. I think he is harmless to others in a direct way, but incapable of living on his own. If he has been injured, or worse, it is the fault of the same heartless state which always finds the cops innocent.

I noticed on the documentary, shot also in cold weather, that there was a lack of housing to get those who desperately needed it, off the street. Today, only because of the Olympics, not empathy for the plight of the desperate, do we see that the cops have the power to forcibly remove people from the street "For health reasons" What kind of political bullshit is that?

Watching this documentary's first half put me in an emotional turmoil about the injustice of the mental health problems and emotional issues surrounding addictions and substance abuse being exacerbated by the Controlled drug and substances act and political entrenchment of police state tyranny.

THE WHOLE LEGAL CIRCUS OF JUDGES, LAWYERS COPS CAN SCREW WITH PEOPLE'S LIVES MAKING OUR COMMUNITIES LESS SAFE, BECAUSE WAY BACK WHEN A MISTAKE WAS MADE PLACING A MORAL JUDGMENT ON HUMAN ADDICTIONS/ILLNESS.

I think that today I will take a psychedelic journey in search of my neighbor on several plains of the metaphysical as well as the pragmatic. I will wander with the white wolf and talk to people and gather more social connections, a deeper emotional bonding with my fellow humans. Then I will return to watch the end of "Staying alive" and perhaps writing some more if the mood strikes me.

I hope that you will also have a deeply rewarding day, enhanced with new delightful, friendly and empathetic human connections, a happy widening of experience/understanding.
Here is some of the connectivity of life that I believe the internet can be used for.

Cpl. Benjamin Monty Robinson is a liar, cowardly & responsible for 2 deaths now

Robert Dziekanski and Orion Hutchinson are dead at least partially due to this lying sum bag cop. Yeah, he took off from the scene to down two shots of vodka. A cop would know to do that, right? And with the welcoming committee for Robert at the Vancouver Airport we can see the same goon taking offensive action when some talking was necessary. Again we see a corruption of "Justice" on behalf of this menace to peaceful people.

"Following a detailed analysis of the results of a comprehensive police investigation, the Criminal Justice Branch has concluded that no Criminal Code driving-related charged will be laid against Cpl. Robinson," said a statement from the branch.

The officer argued in B.C. Supreme Court in March that a motor vehicles adjudicator didn't properly consider his statement that he left the scene of the collision, had two shots of vodka, and then returned to the scene.

Robinson is scheduled to appear in court Dec. 8 on the obstruction charge.

This is my tribute to Orion done soon after his tragic death touched me. Here is the continuity to why I am out in front of the court house.

Season's greetings from the Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society

Here we are at that special time of the year! What better gift that keeps on giving could there be than a "Lawful Excuse?"

Come get 'em while the gettin's good!

I'll be handing them out along with my best wishes at the courthouse protest.

Court days 9am to 10am 222 Main Str Misery Mill Vancouver---rain or shine!