Friday, January 29, 2010

Why do people like Eileen Mohan continue to believe the lies?

I truly empathize with this woman and grieve for her loss. I find it heartless that the RCMP can use her as a spokeswoman to promote their "tough on crime" propaganda.

No one has clued her in to the facts that it is the Laws of Prohibition which caused the black market to flourish. If the law didn't exist, normal people would be allowed to exercise their freedom of choice peacefully and no harm would come to anyone. To govern the illegal trade, violence is indiscriminately employed because there are no courts. No one is shooting it out over the payment or delivery of a truck load of booze, because we left off with the idiocy of prohibition of alcohol a long time ago. Eileen Mohan's son would still be alive today if the drug trade were controlled and regulated like any other consumer items.

It's not the lying cheating con artist cops that will save other innocent people from falling victim to gang violence. They are likely to screw up the investigation because they are careless criminals who don't give a shit for the laws.

It will be the control and regulation of all substances, which the Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society has created the Marijuana Guild for, that will make our communities safer, allow cops the dignity of not having to enforce crime causing laws which are the result of racist lies nearly a century ago.

The police and Judges should not be forced to go against the principal of Jus versus Injuria. The CDSA implements tyranny upon harmless people and is the root of general lawlessness/corruption everywhere in Canada. This crime causing tyranny must not exist in a society which claims to be free, has a bill of rights and be ruled by the rule of Law.

Charge today @ OPCC against Blaine Christian 2187 VPD and his unidentified camo pants clad goon partner

The cops had no business even touching us. We were proceeding peacefully on the sidewalk. In the confrontation 40 minutes previous we touched no one and called police when assaulted by security. The Concord Security guards failed to show their licenses to identify themselves properly, when requested. We left peacefully, as the video will show, after police failed to arrive in a reasonable time frame and we also left behind our card.

Why would we need to be physically assaulted in an ambush 45 minutes after leaving Robson Square peacefully? There is no evidence that either of us have ever had any violent confrontations with police, or anyone, at anytime previously. Why would we need to be taken down in an unprovoked assault without any indication that we might resist? Why is my camcorder stolen? Just what the fack in the way of criminal charges might be forthcoming for either, John, or myself?

Has the VPD no ethics. Why do violent goons wear the uniforms of police?

Why are these anal orifices allowed to break section 337 of the criminal code at will?

Public servant refusing to deliver property -- s. 337

337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. R.S., c. C-34, s. 297.