Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Someone tried very hard to hijack the agenda this morning at the court of Justice meeting. They figured that they could set the time frame of repeal of prohibition of the Psychedelics. Although this person was repeatedly invited to join the Guild they never put in the effort to even understand us. All this person wants to do is conflict with the cops, the courts, the world. He is right, and everyone must march to his tune. One thing you definitely can't label him as, is a team player.
How dare he come in here and spew his agenda forward using his legal assumptions under the Marijuana Party banner and unilaterally try to make us conform to his perceptions.
He never took the time to even study our legal constructs, rather he tried to assert his own thinking, claiming he had right to vote on anything without becoming a member of the Marijuana Guild. The format was that the Judge would decide, no one had said anything about a vote. Why do these assholes keep sabotaging people's attempts to do something unless it conforms to their agenda. Control your own friggen lives and leave others to control theirs, you friggen dingbats. Why always try to steer other people's ships?
This move of legalizing Psychedelics is not for the benefit of me making money on them. They are being sold by everyone, anyways, including myself. It's not about establishing a business and making lots of money while flying right on the edge of the radar scope. For me it is about repealing the crime causing idiocy of prohibition!
I don't need six months of of graduated challenges for my self confidence to build up to the point where the courage to repeal idiocy finally comes. This man clings to the concept that it is a medicine and sick people should use it primarily and Psychedelics are socially less acceptable. Don' do them them!
Total idiocy to let them entrench prohibition further, by degree of supposed harmfulness of the substances. It's giving validity to the argument that there is a need for the state to control your diet if it deems it necessary or politically correct. Its the same as Marc Emery selling out and pleading guilty, now the precedent is set Americans can come in to our country and pluck out whomever they want. What victory is that? It's called appeasement, what Caimberlin did with Hitler.
FREEDOM OF CHOICE MEANS JUST THAT! THE INDIVIDUAL CHOOSES FOR THEMSELVES NO ONE ELSE. NO OTHER PERSON STANDS BETWEEN YOUR LIBERTY TO CHOOSE YOUR DIET, NOT MR. HARPER, NOT MR.MARC BOYER, NOT TO PLACATE OLD LADIES SENSIBILITIES, NOT TO PLEASE FOREIGN MASTERS.
NOT TOO MANY PEOPLE WHO ARE POT ACTIVISTS SEEM TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO KEEP THEIR EYE ON THE BALL.
Let me repeat, so even the really stupid ones can understand: There will be no criminal law controlling anyone's diet in my world. No classifications of substances to give weight to the argument that what we are doing is for your own good.
How dare anyone try to impose their agenda on ours without a word of consultation. As if the world revolves around their political ideas, and theirs alone. I didn't create this legal thing, but I sure know what it's all about and I can fly this aircraft.
Right now I am pushing the envelope to see if the wings will stay on! Go fly your own aircraft and smash it up if you will, this one is in my hands until the goal is reached.
The goal is not primarily to sell as much dope as you can get away with. The primary goal is to repeal the CDSA as we said in the record of parliament. How frigging hard is that to understand?
I don't care what kind of laws Marc Boyer wishes to operate under. I have no real cause to be upset with what Mr. Harper wishes to impose on those of his citizens who will accept the control for their benefit. But my right to be left in peace to make my own choices is sacrosanct, in reciprocation for letting others make their choices in peace.
Of those who seek to be free of tyranny practiced for dietary control, our claim of right gives them the liberty to be left in peace for the personal choices. They have the right in creation to be free to choose to ingest whatever substances they wish. If their behavior impacts anyone in an unlawful/harmful way there are laws to deal with that. Beyond it is not anyone elses right to make a value judgment and call another person's behavior bad and make it a criminal act if it does not directly impact them.
The state practices injustice harming people, encourages others to discriminate against people who prefer a different experience than that of being drunk!
Get a fucking grip you idiots on the bench. You wouldn't know justice, or the rule of law if it slapped you in the face.
We have seen the depraved Judge who forced native girls into sex, and quite a few others. Most stay hidden because they are never held to any accounting.
Rule of law in Canada? Where? Accountability? where?
Posted by bud oracle at 2:26 PM