Enlightened legal discusion on the practice of Injustice by the Government of Canada: theft

Yesterday in the late afternoon I met the Registrar while strolling along the Sea wall just North of Science world. We ended up in a good discussion, as philosophers are sometimes capable of. Upon discussing my recent LSD experiences we came to the conclusion that it is a religious sacrament and extremely harmless, with all the propaganda based on Hyperbole and unconfirmed rumors. The state simply does not have a right to steal someone's property on the basis of a lie or any other reason if that person harms no one else.

We are governed by a monarch, under whose authority I was charged (in the name of Regina). By the oath she took upon taking the throne inscribed in her bible under which authority she rules, she may only rule by the commandments of God. That includes thou shalt not steal and also thou shalt not harm someone physically and deprive them of their liberty when they do no wrong.

I was actually demonstrating the safe way to handled the problem of substances without harming anyone, trying to control and regulate them for adult use only.
What the government does is set a paradigm for the flourishing black market to occur. This is a proven way to accelerate the distribution of substances to children.

It occurred to us to make a video about our discussion in a loose interview/conversational style. These videos are unedited in the sound track but split into two to fit Utube's format.

We have a right to remove ourselves peacefully from a state that seeks to harm us when we interfere with no one and provide a safe way for adults to exercise their freedom of choice.

Nowhere in God's word did he give the Monarch the right to rule by practicing Injustice. In fact when a Monarch fails to rule under the commandments which they have sworn to, they are labelled a tyrant in the Bible and the people are encouraged to disobey them.




Just why do we have to believe lying assholes like Harper, Ignatief, about harsher drug policies, when this experienced ex cop tells the truth in a growing chorus of professionals who have had enough of this crime causing idiocy?



All to promote talentless dishonest political hacks who can't get it up without lying. Up here in Vancouver Canuckistan, its not only policing for fun with other cooperative agencies, but also for political resurrection!

2(b), Cognitive Liberty and Psychedelics
Filed under: Charter — Adminiftrator @ 12:21 am

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms1 states that

Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.

As the clause is predicated of “everyone,” it is a fundamental statement of freedoms, or natural powers of doing what one wishes unless forbidden de jure or by force 2. In 2(b), “freedom of the press and other media of communication” should be read as applying to each preceeding element: effectual freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression requires freedom of media of communication, which explicitly includes the press and, it will be argued, implicitly includes psychedelics drugs.

First, on the question of what is meant by psychedelic drug. The term psychedelic was first used by Dr. Humphrey Osmond in a 1956 letter3 to Aldous Huxley: “To fathom hell or soar angelic, just take a pinch of Psychedelic.” From its greek roots, psychedelic may be literally translated as mind-manifesting, and this is not an altogether bad description of the effect of such drugs, which have their effect primarily upon the mind and one’s thinking.

The Center for Cognitive Liberty and Neuroethics4 defines Cognitive Liberty (CL) as “the right of each individual (a) to think independently and autonomously, (b) to use the full spectrum of his or her mind, and (c) to engage in multiple modes of thought” (letters added). In Ross v. New Brunswick School District No. 15, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 8255 the court cites Edmonton journal v. Alberta (Attorney general), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 13266 on the nature of freedom of expression in 2(b):

In RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd., 1986 CanLII 5 (S.C.C.), [1986] 2 S.C.R. 5737, McIntyre J., speaking for the majority, put the position in this way at p. 583:

Freedom of expression is not, however, a creature of the Charter. It is one of the fundamental concepts that has formed the basis for the historical development of the political, social and educational institutions of western society.

And, therefore, it is reasonable that freedom of thought is not a creature of the Charter; it is another of the above fundamental concepts. If freedom of thought is identical to cognitive liberty, we find that engaging the mind’s capacity for psychedelic thoughts is protected by CL(c), the freedom to engage in multiple modes of thought. The expression “modes of thought” implies that the human mind is capable of multiple modes of thought. Psychedelics assist their users in achieving modes of thought which are predictably brought about by those psychedelics. Cognitive Liberty, then, allows for the production, distribution, and assembly for consumption of materials which facilitate access to multiple modes of thought just as freedom of expression allows for the the same in respect of expressions.

The freedoms in 2(b) are secured specifically by freedom of the press and other media of communication. A medium, to reduce the plural to the singular, is something through which another thing is conveyed: thus freedom of expression is protected by freedom of the press and other media of communication, as the press is a medium through which expression may pass, that is to say, it allows the expression to be communicated from one to another.. What are the media of communication of thoughts?

Psychedelics are a medium through which psychedelic thoughts are reliably communicated. Media of communication with repect to thought must be taken as more than a restatement of expression; otherwise it would be to no purpose to include thought. The effect of psychedelics is best experienced by eating of the materials, like Cordelia, “I cannot heave my heart into my mouth,” and I will not linger on proving psychedelics a medium of communication of a specific mode of thought; the specific content of the mode of thought is not so important to engage CL(c) as is the existence of a mode of thought which people wish to experience, and these reasons may be of a wide variety: interpersonal, aesthetic, religious, spiritual, kinaesthetic, synaesthetic, etc.

If 2(b)’s “freedom of thought” does not extend access to the psychedelic mode of thought as one of the “multiple modes of thought”, to what does it extend? It could be argued that “freedom of thought” is the freedom to have one’s thought influenced by expression, which is to read 2(b)’s “freedom belief, thought, opinion and expression” as though the freedom of the first three must be secured by the freedom of the fourth, which includes freedom of the press and other media of communication. Our view is that the four concepts (belief, thought, opinion and expression) are all and individually secured by freedom of the press and other media of communication. Thus, freedom of thought may be said to be secured by freedom of psychedelic drugs qua media of communication in the same sense that freedom of expression may be said to be secured by freedom of the press as a medium of communicaton.

Therefore, the inclusion of psychedelic drugs, to wit marihuana, psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide, dimethyltryptamine and analogues, salts and isomers thereof, is contrary to s. 2(b) of the Charter as it infringes upon freedom of thought, but is such infringement within “reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society,” thus saving the scheduling by s. 1?

The restrictions under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act in respect of these drugs are contemplated universally, except insofar as s. 56 and various regulations provide exemptions; however, s. 56 is at the minister’s discretion, and no regulation gives an exemption for freedom of thought. The reasonable limitation imposed upon freedom of expression is that it be non-violent. A similar standard of limitation should be imposed upon freedom of thought and the media of communication of thought. There is no evidence that psychedelic thought produces violence, and, therefore, there is no reasonable ground for prohibiting the nonviolent use of psychedelic drugs as of the freedom of thought.

The scheduling could be saved by a system of bonding and licensure for peaceful use, production, trafficking of psychedelics, subject to the normal law merchant, etc. etc.

1. CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982, PART I, Fundamental Freedoms ↩
2. Bracton v. 2 p. 29 ↩
3. Humphry Osmond, Erowid Biography. ↩
4. CCLE FAQ – What is Cognitive Liberty? ↩
5. Ross v. New Brunswick School District No. 15 ↩
6. Edmonton journal v. Alberta (Attorney general), Importance of s. 2(b) of the Charter and the Reporting of Court Proceedings ↩
7. RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd., ↩

For these links live go to: Scire Facius's Blog post

Rational, credible voices on solutions to our drug problems

The above video features a former Judge, prosecutor James Gray. You will notice the mention of Portugal's success in decriminalization of all drugs



This man is a visionary of deep dimensions. Makes me want to investigate the Libertarian movement very much.



This man would get my vote for any office he would run for.



This man displays true compassion laced with reason!


Wow! Judge James Gray is a man who could have sentenced me as wisely and leniently as my last judge. She saw that I am sincerely working towards these goals responsibly. and she implemented a sentence commensurate with with the "crime:" Challenging the drug laws responsibly for the benefits this man talks about!



A talk by the vice president of LEAP on Google Tech talk

I don't like intimidation from the VPD

Below is a recording of what I took as intimidation and what I promptly did about it. Prior to the two part conversation with Press officer for the VPD , Lyndsey Houghton, my own synopsis of the situation is thrown in, in the middle of the recording.


Just beyond where the Wolfs nose is in this video these two officers thought it might be a nice place to take their lunch.

It looks like the First Free Roaming Oracle of modern times has arrived, eh CBC?

What I said to my prof at the Sauder School of Business when I took the Entrepreneurship 101 outreach course in 2005 has finally come true! I told this lovely woman that all I wanted to be was the first free roaming Oracle of modern times. Although I did do well with my more acceptable book project "Soaring and the Art of Umbrella flight," I have finally learned in life that if you really, really want something you really have to go after it.

So when you google these different topics and issues of our times ("Eileen Mohan," "Lori Douglas," "Chief Jim Chu Obstruction Justice") you will find that if I have an opinion on something, it will likely rival that of CBC, or any of the lesser Media whores in the Search Engine Optimization paradigm. This is the great equalizer in today's news and opinions on it, game! Not grand edifices cast in concrete

This to me is remarkable because I wanted to become the voice of "stoner grandpas" like me who do Psychedelics regularly and have something to say against the machine.

Barely 5 five short years later!

I wanted to, and now, I am Wu Li dancing!

All of my writing and creative stuff is done under the influence of mind altering substances, including like now, on LSD, and I have the same voice as the mighty many peopled monolith known as the CBC on the cyber megapipe. My stuff is amateur, done without a budget, all of it off the cuff. I am, after all, a first year university drop out with no writing classes of any kind, only a long history of Psychedelic drug use that according to the government should have made me a blathering idiot.

And that is perhaps what I am: an idiot savant.

STILL, I HAVE A PRESENCE THAT PUNCHES MUCH HIGHER THAN MY WEIGHT LEVEL IN THIS 15 ROUND CONFLICT, DYT (don't you think)?

So stick it up your asses you medias like Can West, Global and CBC. I realize you did me a real favor by not giving me space in your rags of little value. Tanks!

I have learned, like the clever little monkey I am, to use this little hammer called the internet.

Who the fuck needs you to have a say, eh?

Not me!

(My stuff is uncensored for government nice speech, too! I can say, "fuck you," to anyone, in exactly the way I want to express it!)



Someone has to counter this bullshit: Gummie bears laced with LSD a new trend: RCMP Because LSD is easily dosed in a known concentration in liquid form by the drop, since its use in the sixties it has been creatively dispensed in sugar cubes, blotters, micro tabs and gummie bears. What this story shows us is how clueless the RCMP is and how propaganda minded they are immediately painting on the linear conclusion: Gummie bears? "Why they must be for kids"

Yes some of these are likely for kids you lying facking goons, because of the prohibition laws these are marketed to kids and not to adults. Why not tell us how much of a dose each gummie bear contained in a lab report and then we can ask experts in the field if there is enough of the drug in each bear to harm a child or not. The dosage on the street level LSD today seems to be designed not to harm children, like holistic medicines in that there is almost no trace of the active ingredient in a hit.

Here is some more on the LSD laced Gummie Bears in a thread on Cannabis culture Forums New Trend in Drug Trafficking

Here is why we need to keep "chipping away" at the oppressors, because their position is precarious. Noam Chomsky:

From bed bugs to Qur'an burning

A pandemic of bed bugs is troubling humanity. This summer panic set in as my arm swelled up with several insect bites on two occasions. At first the thought of bed bugs bit my mind. I tore up the bed and went closely over it, killing one panicked spider which I had exposed when lifting up the mattress. Nothing further until about one week ago I was bitten twice in one evening by what I felt sure were mosquitoes. The reaction was severe swelling and very itchy week long healing/subsiding with flu like symptoms starting within 24 hours which last for another 36 hours. In making a half joke, voicing my honest reflections, I remarked to several people that I thought my body was successfully fighting off the West Nile virus.

I am a great believer in being my own health care provider and that mostly on the subconscious natural level, as in keeping my immune system in good form by staying in the exposure loop. Alcohol is not good to use especially in excess because it severely limits the functioning of the immune system, whereas marijuana is known for its anti inflammatory properties. To me, who never sees a doctor for anything, it is obvious that my lifestyle and diet are producing the desired effect of good health. It is amazing how much fear is produced in me about the bed bugs invading my place, though. I must deal with it consciously now every time I hear a bit of news about the problem. This leads me into speculation about Wu Li dancing in this area and how I might allow my defenses against them to wane if I succumbed to the fear of them.

At the same time I feel that I am in a state of universal prayer/wonder as I mentioned in a response to Chris Bennett's post in the Cannabis Culture forums:

Am I correct in assuming that you believe that the state of mind achieved through the consumption of Cannabis is/should be equivalent to any one else religious state of worship? As if the act of consuming this plant begets the same state of mind as someone kneeling, prostrating themselves, chanting, spinning a prayer wheel or any other acceptable religious practice such as whirling dervishes, speaking in tongues?

That's good! I like that!

And as one who genuinely tried to assimilate into a Full Gospel congregation in an attempt to become more "spiritual," I can assure you that being in a stoned state (even on LSD), let alone the mellow relaxed receptive state pot puts one in, is much more spiritual than that frenzied state of public "Psychedelic Exhibitionism" known as speaking in tongues.

Anyone watching two crowds from a distance, one on lsd and the other "on" the Holy Ghost, will know which state is safer more rational after two minutes of watching.

I like your argument, if I perceive it correctly!

Good luck!

For me Cannabis puts on a stress free glow which allows me to focus on the beauty around me (some of which, for lack of better metaphor), I call God.

Truly though, I think that god is a very personal undefinable inspiration, to which each seeker must aspire.

For me to know that god is part of the beauty of this world and for me to aspire to the goal that "Beauty will save this world," in a non aligned way, only open to the wonder of it, is enough.

Cannabis helps me achieve this state consistently without impairment of my cognitive or physical abilities. It is my right to walk through life in this worshipful state of bliss. It is not up to MR. Harper to choose one state of religious ecstasy over another, nor how to achieve it.

Good argument!

I wonder how a man such as this pastor, Terry Jones, can call himself a man of God with a handgun on his desk, promoting such reviling hatred as a holy book burning? America is far from any kind of moral leadership role today. That is why, imo, we as friends and a country with similar values must step up and fulfill our role, not as Trudeau saw it, a mouse sleeping with an elephant, but a wide awake elephant driver using his skills and intelligence to make the beast behave in a productive civilized manner.

The world, especially the well armed dangerous belligerents, need moral guidance!

This role is filled not by being armed to the teeth and threatening to export your perversion which you proudly misname "democracy" at the point of weapons controlled from a half world away. The fact that more people in the states wish to exercise hatred and intolerance, than welcoming peace, shows me that the religion they practice and their form of governance is one of repression, not freedom.

The whiff of blood is in the air for the third world as realization is becoming evident that this military industrial complex is doomed to fail in a calamity of human misery. The only thing keeping the wolves of world-wide vengeance, retaliation, for the rape and plunder of the world's resources, and oppression of humanity at bay, is their sophisticated nuclear weaponry.

One day all that weaponry won't be enough: when the masses don't have enough to eat on a global level. The chorus of "Yankee go Home!" is starting to ring ever louder around the globe for good reason!

The land of the free? but not to worship Islam? Free to burn holy books and rape and pillage the world, but not to build an Islamic study site near the world trade tower's former location? What kind of absurdity is on the wind in America today?

What I see here is Canadian leadership so bereft of intelligence that we blindly link ourselves to this wounded rampaging beast, America, and never have the cojones to stand up and do the right thing. It is our duty to take the reigns of moral leadership that the world wants us to, for all of humanity's sake. Why this obvious licking of a mad man's boots? These types of right wing pastors as Terry Jones are condoned and supported by the back woods Albertans, which spawned Stephen Harper, while pot smokers are demonized. Give me a fucking break!

I honestly didn't know why I linked these two subjects in the title of my post, except these two subjects were on my mind (intro to the Sunday Edition today September 12th 2010 was about bed bugs and the crazy guy was also in the news a lot) but upon googling "bed Bugs burning" I came across this interesting blog post:

The Rev. Jones apparently believes Muslims are akin to bedbugs... a pest to destroy. Fact is, it's mosquitoes that carry disease, not bedbugs. Maybe to those of the Christian faith, those who "Trust in God", Islam is a pest, but they are not the devil that Rev. Jones would believe they are.

Here is something those of you in Europe might wish to attend.

Dancing Wu Li masters, S&M, Lori Douglas associated Chief Justice

Here is my latest and last video on the subject on Bud's Island, False Creek Vancouver. That was written only a few hours ago but now it seems that there are further serious allegations which surfaced. As I did mention in my initial post, it should be upon a thorough review of her decisions that final judgment be withheld.

Follow the back conversation over this on Cannabis Culture forums "Agency 59 sounds pretty sinister to me"


A three hour audio summary of the Dancing Wu Li masters by Gary Zukav

In this University of Washington program, award-winning writer, director, and producer David Lynch discusses his films and his 30-year relationship with Transcendental Meditation, and its role in his creative process. He is joined by physicist John Hagelin, who was featured in the documentary 'What The Bleep Do We Know?' and neuroscientist Dr. Fred Travis, Director of the Center for Brain, Consciousness, and Cognition at Maharishi University of Management.

Or for another viewpoint try Tao of physics Fritjof Capra


What is it that I am trying to get at with this transposition of S&M and Judicial improprieties as well as blackmail, and political propaganda, and of course Physics, you may well ask?

I am dancing, am the dance at the same time. For me it is almost like soaring my hang glider was a revelation to me one day, to watch the thousands of people visiting my blog on this story as well as others. On the hang glider, on a fine day just under cloud base, somewhere over the Athabasca River near Hinton, much higher than the Rocky Mountains to the west, while the variometer was chortling its song of lift, as I was feeling surges of upward acceleration connecting me with the turbulent heart of the thermal, I looked up and happened to see the sun under my high wing.

The air was rough. The airframe of the glider groaned and sang in protest as the G forces loaded and unloaded. We were close to the freezing line, or cloud base, with the wide panorama of mother earth about three to four kilometers below me. At once, in an instant, I connected the live actions I was experiencing, including the view, wind sound and the adrenaline rush in real time, to our solar furnace and a packet of photons reaching out from the very core of stellar fusion, ninety three million miles away. In one long unbroken event, only taking thirteen minutes to reach the ground below me and heat that bubble of hot air in another parcel of time very similar to the packet of photon's journey at the speed of light, I was riding on/experiencing, the results of a stellar produced thermo nuclear reaction first hand. I realized in one moment of grandeur that I had ahold of the primal forces of the universe on several planes at once (gravity, stellar fusion and of course the biological me: the living appendage of nature looking at itself) and was using them to milk this parcel of ecstasy for an excellent, uniquely wonderful, visceral/spiritual experience (called an "airgasm" by many old time pilots). My name for this riding of thermals is "Riding the Fusion Dragon"

This paradigm shift is one of many I have experienced in life and they always all come from pursuing something I am intensely interested in, usually while I am enjoying myself. Like almost all my flights, I toked before I launched on this one, too. Probably Afghani hashish and yuki tobacco.

I like being Stoned in Suburbia, too!

Why are these people made out to be evil and criminalized? Aren't they just like you and me?

Isn't about time to turf these politicians who continue to manufacture crime where there is none?


That Carline Coone is hot!


Why not loosen up?

Lori Douglas, associate chief justice of Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench is only human

This is not shocking or even terribly interesting to me other than what it means in the broader perspective of public oversight of these institutions and the people who control our laws and have a monopoly of our Justice system. It is these same types of all too human (capable of mistakes or even corruption) fellow clowns as prosecutors that made decisions to not proceed against Willi Pickton on attempted murder charges, because in their opinion Jane Doe would not have made a good witness due to her drug use

The reporter in the News video clip says this raises questions about whether she disclosed her indiscretions as required and that might challenge her legitimacy as a judge. I say it should go deeper than that and see if she was biased for or against in her judgment of black men seeing as she might have a preference or even secret aversion to black men. The human psyche is deep and weirdly wide. Some would say wonderfully wide, even in such a case as this, but that is why there must be constant vigilance of our institutions, affective open methods of scrutiny for all of those whom we put in positions of trust over us. This is one reason why we need cameras to shine the light of day into our courtrooms, so that others might recognize who actually is sitting in judgment and whether they have any prejudices.

Aren't these the people in important positions Alex Carey claims the tree top strategy is marketing propaganda to?

All I am saying, is that without oversight and effective control, tyranny will develop as we see happening now. It is the monopoly of these important positions by the Law Societies of Canada which determines whether justice is applied in everyday circumstances. Lawyers, Judges can't be trusted to speak up and report something that they should because they are not interested in the rule of law, it seems, only the rulings in law. Just think about how the former law firm never mentioned any improprieties although they knew of the photos. We, as citizens, are required to inform police of a crime or we become accessories after the fact. Why not lawyers, too?

One day even the sheep might wake up if the reporters ask more than one question.

The crime is not in what she did in her private moments, rather that she did not reveal these indiscretions as required by law. Those who knew, such as her former firm, are duty bound to their profession, to the Justice system to have at least revealed what they knew in the interests of Justice, to preserve the rule of law and the respect of the Judiciary.

6:04 Pm.... I have been out interviewing Black men and others on my handycam. Very surprising the reactions

The reason that I think that it is odd that the former firm would not at least have come to her about it is this: In keeping it to themselves the question arises would they try to use it as leverage themselves in an important case/interaction?

That is the reason these things must be disclosed because of the potential hold someone who knows something like this has on another person.

I understand that this poor woman has resigned temporarily. This was the only thing she could do under the circumstances. It is sad that her husband and herself didn't have better judgment. Once having been publicly exposed it is too bad she didn't show better ethical base and have better judgment. If she did, in the spring, again answer untruthfully as to her vetting for the position of associate Chief Justice about having engaged in behavior which might cast dispersion on the Judiciary, then she might suffer the consequences.

If Judges can jail me for my choice of substances I can demand that they be truthful when taking on their office on my behalf. That is why as Chief Justice of the Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society I too must consider how I act, although I never had to answer any questions about things I might have done in the past.

Anyways I wish her well in the future and see no reason why, when all this is exposed and no longer has any hold on anyone, why she couldn't resume her duties and position of trust, a wiser more experienced person. Having had problems in her own life now she may have developed some valuable insights and empathy for others who have screwed up.

This is embarrassing, but should not prevent a person valuable to the community from reentering her productive role. Doing what is right does not necessarily mean destroying the person but educating and assisting can be productive alternatives for everyone. Let's not be vindictive. And the other thing is that she did actually have a right to expect Alex Chapman to have destroyed the pictures because that was the settlement he agreed to and she paid him to do. Now he trots them out again. He could be guilty of blackmail. It is a fine line.

Isn't this really just a crack in the smooth, seemingly seamless surface of the fiction we call our Justice system.


As of the 8th September 2010 this story is gaining legs! A further allegation of impropriety has surfaced in which the Judge failed to excuse herself on a matter where she may have had a more personal/biased involvement. Wu Li dancing is happening

The war on Drugs: A fresh, complete perspective

Part 1 - drug problems in Scotland "Everyone's at It"






Part 2 - drug problems in America "The Life and Death of a Dealer"






Part 3 - drug problems in Afghanistan "Birth of a Narco-State"






Doesn't this cartoon say it all?


Vote Yes for Proposition 19 California this November and help to start putting an end to the insanity!

Alex Carey & Edward Bernays (Free downloads MP3)

A very interesting take on our problems that I have had some knowledge of but which is being refreshed tonight


It is Monday the 30th 11.00 am and the Wolf has just left on his weekly group walk to the Spanish banks today. He loves the pack mode. Like us. That is why dog/wolves are so "domesticatable."

The above mp3s are all studies/understandings of how a herd of humans is easily manipulated. I am in the process of studying Alex Carey's unpublished manuscript some more. I will be doing a bit by bit audio response to these extremely pregnant audio illuminations.

Until then I am going out to take more raw footage and photos for winter video making. If you wonder what this has to do with Diane Rothon and the Paul Boyd inquiry as I see someone at BCIT is today, it is this: We are ruled by propaganda, as mainly in the form of the absence of truth. The lies get to stand because no one allows the truth to be heard. Part of the truth in Paul Boyd's case is that He had his hands up when the cop started to shoot and also very importantly, The Police Chief then corrupted Justice on behalf of the shooter before an investigation was even started. Then when I laid a formal and very proper complaint in the Complaint Commissioner's office, that investigation was also corrupted by the Chief as he was sitting on the Police Board which deemed me incompetent to lay the charge.

You the public are being deceived via the fact that none of this has even come to your attention yet. Like the 911 inquiry was unable to reach a believable finding because all the facts of explosions, thermite and building 7 were not brought before the commissioners.

So, is this Paul Boyd Inquiry that we are gonna have an act of propaganda to help make the lies stand, or, is it going to try to establish the facts? We already know that by holding an inquiry no one will be held to account criminally.

The fact is, though, that I charged chief Jim Chu under the police act and is is accountable to criminal justice, with the maximum sentence being 5 years for obstructing justice. Do I think that he will ever be held to account? Well I know strange things have happened in my life. I can fly and I am getting pretty fat, too! So I know that pigs can fly to some extent. Look, sooner or later something is gonna have to give in this obviously corrupt system. Will my straw be the one to break the camel's back? Hey, you never know. I have a much better chance than the suckers that buy lottery ticket's, imo.

The Deep Capture Hypothesis

“The universal spirit of the laws, of every country is always to favor the strong against the weak and those who have against those who have not. This difficulty is inevitable, and it is without exception.”

~Jean Jacques Rousseau

“The twentieth century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy.”

~Alex Carey

My remix of the two MP3s condensed into one shorter version of "Corporations and Propaganda by Alex Carey"- no mics involved!



I know that I am on to something here, because other than the letter to Cross Country Checkup, when one puts "Corporations and Propaganda by Alex Carey cbc" into Google one gets this as the only CBC reference to him. The Canadian Champion Propaganda Network CBC, installed by the government with your money, has never done a program about this man, Alex Carey. Why not?

Too close to the bone?

The rhetoric about commitment to ‘democracy’ by our supposedly democratically elected leaders of the hemisphere is obviously just a cynical response to growing public awareness and outrage regarding the realities of corporate rule and the sellout of our sovereignty by the governments run by corporate owned and operated parties. This opens the question of whether so-called free elections constitute anything that may ethically be called democracy, as the Democracy Clause is implying.

Australian Professor, Alex Carey got it right in his book, “Taking the Risk Out of Democracy:, Corporate Propaganda vs. Freedom and Liberty.

Carey’s book illuminates how big business propaganda waged by public relations experts, subverts democracy and ensures corporate dominance.

More and more citizens are getting at the truth of this, and that’s why such low numbers turned out to vote in a system which ensures that only a Big Money party has a chance to win. Our unfair first-past-the-post system, which forces people to vote for the lesser of evils and never for what they really want, discourages ever increasing numbers of frustrated citizens to withdraw from their rigged game, and take to the streets to let their voices be heard.

If Mr. Chretien is so keen on democracy, why did he duck the question of letting all the people of all countries of the Americas to have a referendum on their corporate sponsored Unfair Trade Agreement of the American$? He said we didn’t have one on the FTA and NAFTA, so why should we now for the FTAA$?

Well, excuse me, but only about 43% of Canadians voters [essentially the better-off 30% of our population] voted for the FTA in 88, but Mulroney was able to ram it through because of the distorted dictatorships that arise from our unfair first-past-the-post system. Chretien himself campaigned in 93 that he would not implement NAFTA without re-negotiation, and suckered the Canadian public to vote for him, and then signed on the dotted line where the Americans and the Canadian corporations they own told him to do.

Why should people trust such leaders? And where is “democracy” in all of these proceedings?

In fact, the hemispheric FTAA$ was the real plan of corporate America from the very beginning. Since no free people were then willing to allow their sovereign freedoms to be sacrificed on the alter of corporate greed, they had to keep their real plan a deep dark secret. Canadians now see that they were suckered into this agenda with FTA in ’88, and with its escalation to NAFTA and its infamous Chapter 11 [giving foreign corporations domination over national sovereignty and democratic freedoms.]

So now, faced with increasing public awareness and protests, they pretend to now be concerned about democracy and other civil rights. The reality is that, with the power of foreign corporations and investors to pick and choose to support only countries that let them have everything they want, democracy has been stripped of any power to actually be government of, by and for the people. So the governing collaborators of corporate rule are free to extend this kind of ‘pseudo democracy’ to powerless ‘third world’ countries.

Not only can the powers of corporate money and its propaganda techniques determine the results of so-called democratic elections, the carrot and stick powers of capital investment, capital flight and capital strike essentially dictate what governments must do. Which is essentially why all existing governments are committed to selling out their sovereignty and their nations’ democratic freedoms to Big Money and corporate rule.

Diana Jewell
North Vancouver, British Columbia

Well said Diana!

Isn't this bit of News from the National CBC only confirmation that what they have been telling everyone about marijuana having no medicinal value is propaganda after all. As we have been saying for half a century and all of history. Cannabis is a plant with medicinal value! Can be grown cheaply by anyone who needs it. Marijuana is also safer than any pharmaceutical to use!

The reason it is illegal is because big pharma has a very strong economic interest which also dovetails with the states interest in not having its population become more reflective, less stressed, less fearful, and therefore less aggressive. Keep the sheeple frightened, belligerent and ready to send sons to war on any slight lie:

Why not feed them alcohol, another large corporate interest there, isn't it.

Isn't it time for these incompetent politicians to give up their addiction to Incarcerex?