Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Researchers find marijuana smoke not linked to cancer






Here is a Canadian who will not step away from benefitting his society no matter the forces aligned against him. He knows the truth as I, and legions of others do, as well. Why would doctors be allowed to keep anyone from using anything that they deem effective for what ever reason? Especially a terminally ill patient?

There is deception everywhere in our government keeping a common cure for cancer and many other ailments that people could grow in their own gardens from competing with the monopolies of big Pharma. Why are people like Rick and myself persecuted for something that you can see in my utube videos as being happily accepted by my community during our public sale of cannabis?

Why are we being persecuted when all evidence points to maruijuana being a benfit to humanity? Where is the harm that we might keep this possible cure for cancer, happiness producing plant, illegal? In the Bill of rights and freedoms it says:

"no law of Canada shall be construed or applied so as to

(a) authorize or effect the arbitrary detention, imprisonment or exile of a person;"


For what reason are they harming harmless people committing a harmless act by their imprisonment and exposure to physical violence from their jailers?

Why do they have a warrant on Klaus Kaczor when he no longer exists due to having withdrawn his consent to be governed by Canada? What harm has he done to his fellow people? who on those videos objects to what Bud is doing? Why do people congratulate and thank Bud the Oracle profusely and endlessly when Rob Nuickleson claims Canadians want harder drug legislation. Who has proof of their claims? Who is lying, the Justice Minister, or, Bud the Oracle?

Can anyone point to any behavior that is not peaceful?

Why were we left unmolested on August the 9th and then arrested 2 days later after calling 911 for an assualt perpetrated on me? Does that mean that the police will only arrest us if criminals try to evict us from their territory? Does that mean that the cops/courts work to keep the criminals in business?



Don't forget to experience the interactive art of the Rainforest Theatre's next show, Villains vs. Heroes. It's happening over the next two weekend's (Friday, Saturday, Sunday at 8pm) at Trout Lake (North End by the pier, near Victoria Dr. and E. 14th) and it would be great if you are able to make it (complimentary). It's an interactive adventure/action/comedy.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

bad news for Klaus Kaczor!

Warrant issued for this former person.

Looks like the rule of law does not apply to court proceedings.

Good news!



Recall of a conversation assuring me of the imminent return of my camera!I told the Sgt that I was a benefit to society while the government is actively trying to make me out to be a criminal

NOT TOO MANY PEOPLE RISK THEIR LIVES TO DO THE RIGHT THING AS I DID IN THE MP3 BELOW: "I TRUSTED THE RCMP" A true story of police corruption and the perversion of a good deed to blackmail me into submission. Your police forces hard at work solving crime. This was during the time of the Picton Pig Farm murders. Obviously these cops were too busy doing there own thing to help stop those crimes. Facken morons is what the RCMP were who tried to screw with me.




Green Living:
How To Change The World

The power of change lies in us all. We are strong enough in each individual to conquer the tyranny of the state.

I still remember that brave Chinese student standing up to the tank. See movie below




Why you never get ahead

Monday, August 24, 2009

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Marijuana makes me more aware, not less intelligent





Another season for forest fires throughout the world could be chnging weather patterns. Immediately global warming deniars are on the roosts squawking about solar cycles and normal weather patterns due to natural factors. More people are executed in the prohibition battles here in the lower mainland. Crime and police promoters deny it is due to the policies of prohibition.

It almost seems absurd to me at times, that I am trying to change something so unmoveable, so large as a society's ignorance. Do the forces in power not want a lawful, peaceful society? If they could point to ONE successful social model where prohibition worked then I might have faith in the strategy. THE EXACT OPPOSITE IS PROVEN TRUE BY HISTORY IN EVERY CASE: PROHIBITION CAUSES MORE LAWLESSNESS AND CRIME THAN IT DOES GOOD FOR SOCIETY.


THEREFOR IT IS A MYSTERY WHY THESE POLITICIANS CAN GET ELECTED PROMOTING ENDLESSLY A PROVEN FAILED POLICY.

Do our "leaders" not have a duty to abandon failed policy and try something different as part of their social contract? I can't understand the likes of candidates here for the provincial elections promoting the same line 1920's prohibitionists used. These candidates bring their culture which includes autocratic dictastorships and executions to our society and these policy lines are happily adopted by the mainstream conservative parties.

It seems people are either too stupid to understand the mechanisms of power or they have been distracted purposedly through fraud to impliment policies which are not in their best interests. You have a corrupted system which works for those in power at the expense of the citizenry. Every year you pay more recieve fewer benefits, hire more cops, judges, and lawyers and we have more lawlessness. And people blithely continue to support failed policy, because it is promoted through fraud by people in trusted positions.


There seems to be a veil over people's eyes. Perhaps it is due to the expansion of irrational fear, the distrust of normal curiosity and personal freedoms of confident men and women. The shift is from personal resilience to the nanny state as we are expected to give up more of our income to buy safety through social insurance policies and services.


More than 99% of the people I meet readily agree that prohibtion is a failed policy. I speak in depth with at least 1000 people a year randomly, and less than a handful are for prohibition, therefore I conclude that our Justice Minister is lying when he claims that a majority of Canadians want harsher penalties for drug offenders. Why we must suffer as a country with shootings, and violent crime, less respect for the police and the law for a lie, is beyond me. This policy is causing social mayhem which is increasing in its intensity the longer these policies are in place and the harsher they become. Drug use is a personal choice with no relation in nature to a criminal act.

The entire sole purpose of THE criminal law is to govern interactions BETWEEN people. These interactions are basically violence, theft, fraud, slander. Any interaction where one party unfairly interacts with another party causing physical injury, mental injury, economic injury to another party is a crime.

The use of drugs of all kinds directly causes injuries, if injuries occur, to the user only. The dangerous behavior of people who use any substances and those who are not using any drugs is already covered by criminal law; impaired driving, family violence, abherrent sexual behavior. The side effects of normal drug use are no worse than alcohol use, if that. The use of motor vehicles is much more dangerous, killing millions directly in the world today while contributing largely to climate change. According to the best scientific data available, the use of all substances combined is nowhere near the impact of our growing addiction to gasoline.

This prohibition is only another version of the tyranny of a majority over a visible minority and comes directly from an era which promoted such hateful human instincts as policies of social experiments. The fact is, it is a useful vestige of that time of social control experimentation to be used for today's politicians to generate fear and hate. It is a built in whipping boy that the mindless bovine herd can be relied on to respond to as it has been taught in a multi generational trained way. To criminalize freedom of choice over a moral judgement call from that era is in itself on the face of it, absurd, considering the mountains of knowledge we have accumulated through science since then. We have also appologized for some ot their other racist legislation in light of today's standards, but stubbornly these politicians climg to the lie for their own purposes.

For instance, we have overwhelming evidence from modern science not available to the people who put these laws into the criminal code, that marijuana is beneficial, rather than harmful, to its users. We have overwhelming eveidence that prohibition causes increases in substance use and crime.. There is a mountain of evidence that these laws cause corruption in every level of policing and government. In my life alone I have caught the very top levels of the Canadian Government breaking the crimional code in an organized fashion because of this law, in an effort to harden these laws.

When you think about it, it boggles the mind. The reason you hear nothing and CBC is relunctant to give me much exposure, is (a) I caught them aiding the government in promotinhg a hate crime after the 4 mounties were murdered in Mayerthorpe. (CRTC file # 233039). I had no lawyer, otherwise they would have had to pay a large sum of money. Without checking to the government's statement's veracity, CBC blithely promoted the lie that marijuana growers (and by implication smokers) were indirectly responsible for this crime within hours of its commission. How arrogantly adsurd for a sophisticated corporation like CBC to climb on to a hate crime being committed. The legal department should have known what this "stupid toker" KNEW while toking on a joint of Trainwreck; "That when these guys blame something on having been committed by a certain group, without even a preliminary investigation, it is likely to be vicious propaganda." The cops and government officials were tasked to respond by saying these words if they were being fair and honest as required by law: "The matter is still under investigation therefore I can not comment." Holding a readily identifiable groups responsible before any investigation is done is irresponsible AND ILLEGAL.

It is the same kind of incompetence which is quite common in Canadian police murder investigations in which they target someone as being guilty and railroad an innocent victim for the crime allowing the murderer to escape and commit another crime.

(b)The Canadian governemnt, once I made it aware of the breaches of the Broadcasting Act and the Hatecrimes Act, should have charged those actors who promoted this hatecrimes on TV and Radio, under the hate crimes act. It was good enough for Paul Martin, Steve Harper and Jack layton, all of whom I apprised iof the crime, to allow the commissioner of the RCMP to withdraw his statements and appologize for making them. You never see this segment aired by CBC as much as they aired the lies of the government. In not charging these people with the crime they committed it means that the Canadian government committed, and then covered up, its commission of A HATE CRIME AT THE VERY HIGHEST MINISTERIAL LEVELS.


(C) THE RULE OF LAW WAS FURTHER jeprodized when the Provincial Judiciary, and also the federal Justice departments, then would not allow DAVID AHENEKEW to withdraw his hateful STATEMENTS WHICH DID NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF A GOVERNMENT MAKING THEM AND WERE MORE HISTORICALLY HATEFUL, RATHER THEN A CONCERTED EFFORT TO CALL FORTH HATRED AGAINST A LARGE SEGMENT OF OUR PRESENT POPULATION which the government ministers were trying actively to do.
Hear my involvement in this part of our history on this 5 minute mp3 podcast "An email can change the world"


Another reason why you will not hear of my intelligent actions on anyy media is that it will encourage the average person to believe that they have power. This is contrary to what the government wants us to believe. In fact they don't want any more people hearing about the fact that you can become free from the bullshit by formally withdrawing your consent. Along with the forces that rule us now we are against other activists who seek to conform to the system but beg it to change on their behalf. We say the whole thing is a stinking foul mess which needs to be overhauled in creative ways in order for us to be able to adapt to the ever changing conditions which are a normal part of the flux of evolving life.

The whole social system has become a stagnant pool, a quagmire of foul laws and moral attitudes designed to dampen the bright creativity of the human sopirit and make us into fearful slaves of conformity, wards of the Nanny State..

It's about time you get off your collective fat, sugar fed asses, and do something to ensure your freedom, even a chance at the future for your children. The system we have in place now needS radical overhauling by sincere openminded people who will never be given a chance to. It is fATALLY FLAWED BEING TERMINALLY RESISTANT TO CHANGE.

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Bud the Oracle's fax to the Vancouver District Provincial Court

Court on the 18th in CR 307









Cover letter to Vancouver District Provincial Court

Bud the Oracle
budoracle@electricsee.org



Free Man Upon the Land


phone: 778 329 6043

fax

To: In Re: 201530 Fax: (604) 660-4322
Date: July 2, 2007 Pages: 02
Comments:
Under this cover find our lawful excuse from your de facto court.

Main transmittion to the Vancouver District Court

Spoken version of the fax below (MP3 audio archive):


Bud the Oracle

Chief Justice of The Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society

Clerk of the Marihuana Guild

Free Man Upon the Land

budoracle@electricsee.org

phone: 778 329 6043

Saturday, August 22, AD 2009.

In Re: File Numbered 201530
Vancouver District Provincial Court


To Whom It May Concern:

On the Eighteenth day of August of the two thousand and ninth year of our Lord we did
present ourself in your Court 307 as Bud the Oracle, an agent for our former persona Klaus
Kaczor. We did demand that the woman occupying the bench give sight and hearing of her
commission by which she is granted jurisdiction over ourself, Bud the Oracle. We did ask
her three times to give sight and hearing of her commission, and she failed to provide it.
Therefore, we proclaimed that she was not a holder of any office in right of the Crown and
that no one present need acknowledge her as such. At this time she directed Sheriff Services
to remove ourself from the Court.


We were removed into the hallway where we sat for some time. About an hour later a Staff
Seargant, numbered 734, directed us to Court 514. We felt we should comply as there was
a sign at the door saying that you will be tasered if you do not comply with the Sheriffs.
Therefore, we went with them to Court 514 and sat within the gallery.


A man in black robe with red sash entered the Court and took the bench. He called the
matter of Klaus Kaczor up, and we again stood as agent for Klaus Kaczor, our former
persona. We did then demand sight and hearing of the commission of the man occupying
the bench of Court 514. He did not produce a valid and subsisting commission, and we did
demand this thing three times, and after he had failed for the third time to produce such, we
proclaimed that he was not a holder of any office in right of the Crown and that we need not
acknowledge any of his judgements as having the force of Law.


Therefore, we do not recognize your process as sufficient nor lawful, and we do reiterate that
we are lawfully excused from your Court per our Claim of Right, Bud the Oracle, Chapter I,
Schedule I item III, a copy of which we do include below:


"I claim the right to revoke my consent to be represented and governed by other than myself
via lawful excuse and by so doing free myself from all statutory obligations, restrictions and
limitations, if doing so is in my best interest.
"


Truly,


Bud the Oracle
All Rights Reserved.


Friday, August 21, 2009

The OPCC, "A useless tit of an Organization"





I'll keep you apprised of the process.

I laid a complaint about the assault on Monday 17th. Today I have been after trying to get my camera back. It was in the possession of someone who was arrested not charged, and then released in about 7 hours. The VPD has literally stolen this valuable tool for my activism but it is a vital link to my safety for recording events around me as well.

Here is the email I sent off this morning. does anyone have any better ideas?

Greetings and peace to all whom these presents may come,

I wish to know the status of my complaint.

Also I wish direction as to if this is the appropriate place to lay charges of false imprisonment, false arrest, theft of property by the VPD?

I also have a fee schedule which was formerly submitted to the Canadian Government and wish to submit my bill for these unlawful infractions covered thereby.

Bud the Oracle
Chief Justice
Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society
Clerk Marijuana Guild
Freeman on the Land


This is the response they gave me this afternoon. Notice how the complaint against 2, probably 3, guards has suddenly turned into "The jail guard referenced in your complaint has yet to be identified"

Dear Sir: Your email of August 21, 2009 has been forwarded to me, as I am the Investigative Analyst assigned your most recent complaint. Please note the following responses:



Ø In regards to the status of your complaint (OPCC 2009-4799):



· It has been characterized as a public trust complaint and a related notice has been forwarded to you in today’s mail.

· The jail guard referenced in your complaint has yet to be identified. However, I note that it has only been four days since you lodged your complaint.

· Unless your complaint is dismissed, informally resolved, or withdrawn, a commencement of investigation report may be anticipated within 45 days and subsequent progress reports every 30 days.



Ø In regards to the laying of criminal charges:



· Sergeant Jeff Rice of the VPD Professional Standards Section has responsibility for the investigation of your complaint, including the forwarding of reports to Crown Counsel when deemed to be appropriate.

· You may want to discuss the laying of charges of “false imprisonment, false arrest, theft of property” with him.

· Sergeant Rice may be contacted through the main switchboard for the City of Vancouver at 604-717-3535.

· Please note that the Professional Standards Section file number for your complaint is 09-145208.



Ø In regards to your “fee schedule”:



· There are no provisions under Part 9 of the Police Act (complaints) for compensation for injury or damages.

· Should you wish to make a financial claim against the Vancouver Police Department, you will need to contact Risk Management of the City of Vancouver.



Respectfully,



William MacDonald

Investigative Analyst

Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner




I liked Charlie Chaplin's speech so much in the video Robert Menard Posted that I recorded my own version of it below, for the halibut. Just hit go



This is my Claim of Right. The document was formally submitted to various principals of the Canadian Government. I borrowed someone else's template and used it for myself.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Here is the success of Prohibition to look forward to.



I actually benefited from Marc's overgrow the Government Strategy when I had a good income from efforts in the marijuana grow industry. Although I am not a fan of his style, his efforts are considerable and relentless.

Plus he is a good speaker to a receptive audience. Thanks Marc, I appreciate your efforts and if they wish to jail me I have you as a model to look up to in resolve. I will, as I did before, lobbly the proper jokers.