This group of concerned bikers was standing around very quietly being present. Until I came there was no action. The cops and sheriffs were looking bored. Once I began to shout things like "this bell (ring my tiny bell with a cross on it) tolls for Robert Dziekanski, TASERed to death by the RCMP" "This bell tolls for Ian Bush,shot in the back of the head by the RCMP" "This bell tolls for Orion Hutchison, killed by a drunk RCMP" "This bell tolls for Robert Knipstrom bludgeoned and TASERed to death by the RCMP" "This bell tolls for Kevin St. Arneau, shot to death by the RCMP" "This bell tolls for the death of Justice in Canada." the armed gang members always above the law earning a hefty wage were not looking bored.
My presence was felt!
Canadians have been trained to behave and be accepting of all the bullshit the government feeds us and remain nice. I am getting to understand why the press stays away from me like the plague. One guy eloquently smearing their own crap into their faces with a clear strong voice is way more effective than a quiet respectful crowd milling around with signs by a long shot.
There is no way to ignore a biting truth flung at you with a strong clear voice. It enters the psyche and injures the spirit if it has the ring of truth.
The silent milling about is a behavior that speaks to me of a cowed attitude, a well behaving little citizen. Come on you mice open your big mouths. Can't get loud unless you have consumed some courage in the form of alcohol and socially trained to only be loud at sporting events? Good meek, quiet Canadians easily managed by a handful of overweight sheriffs and scared trigger happy mounties looking for a stapler or dangerous sign bearer.
Come on people, if you are pissed off at something why not show it? Speak the fuck up you mealy mouthed complainers.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Monday, December 7, 2009
TASER Warning signs to be removed from BC courthouses
A reply from the Attorney general's office to my video thanks to the UDS Registrar.
So, maybe take a peek inside to see if the sign is down, though it might
take a few days...
So who really gives a crap what the rest of you controlling types think sooner or later you will be giving me the freedom I demand. I am not harming anyone and my state of mind is my choice so you can take a flying fuck and get off my back. One thing is for sure I will not be judged by the likes of anyone who could walk by that ignorant sign for many months and claim to be trained in the law and loftily claiming like that hypocritical Judge who sentenced David Malmo Lavine, to be about the rule of law. Yeah, right you lying violent oppressor supporting fucks!
I will not be submitting to lawless tyrants who pervert justice daily, anytime soon. Especially when I risked my life on the 11th of August to make my community safe, was submitted to assault by the jail guards all so that these perverts, who are busy making my community unsafe while destroying the rule of law, can wear nice clothes. Not by a long shot.
Just letting you know what I think on the record so you can think what you like without a single twinge of guilt. Go get a couple of belts of Scotch in ya, laddy! That should settle the nerves, I know that I am a scary lookin' guy! Grain alcohol will do if you are really nervous and have nothin' else. Not too much though.
"Thank you for your e-mail of November 23, 2009 addressed to the Attorney General regarding the TASER warning sign posted at the Vancouver Provincial Court house. I have been asked to respond on behalf of the Attorney General.
I appreciate your bringing this issue to the Attorney General’s attention. As a result of the Braidwood Inquiry recommendations, I have directed all sheriff offices to remove the TASER warning signs located in secure areas of British Columbia courthouses.
Yours sincerely,
Dave Maedel
Executive Director and Chief Superintendent
Sheriff Services Division, Court Services Branch
Ministry of Attorney General"
So, maybe take a peek inside to see if the sign is down, though it might
take a few days...
So who really gives a crap what the rest of you controlling types think sooner or later you will be giving me the freedom I demand. I am not harming anyone and my state of mind is my choice so you can take a flying fuck and get off my back. One thing is for sure I will not be judged by the likes of anyone who could walk by that ignorant sign for many months and claim to be trained in the law and loftily claiming like that hypocritical Judge who sentenced David Malmo Lavine, to be about the rule of law. Yeah, right you lying violent oppressor supporting fucks!
I will not be submitting to lawless tyrants who pervert justice daily, anytime soon. Especially when I risked my life on the 11th of August to make my community safe, was submitted to assault by the jail guards all so that these perverts, who are busy making my community unsafe while destroying the rule of law, can wear nice clothes. Not by a long shot.
Just letting you know what I think on the record so you can think what you like without a single twinge of guilt. Go get a couple of belts of Scotch in ya, laddy! That should settle the nerves, I know that I am a scary lookin' guy! Grain alcohol will do if you are really nervous and have nothin' else. Not too much though.
Law and the Bible
Some thoughts posted in Cannabis Culture Forums by the Registrar of the Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society. He is posting as Malaclypse IV
"So that's what you call it eh? Christian-Libertarian...where did you pick up your Christian influences from?"
Well, I've been interested in drug prohibition since I was in gradeschool and a coffee-swilling public educator tried to tell us kids about the evils of "drugs"---well, clearly some drugs are OK, you're drinking coffee...didn't go over too well.
So, fast forward to a couple of years ago. I was taking a mixture of arts courses at The University of British Columbia, including Critical Studies in Sexuality. I mention this course because it taught me that the "left", for lack of a better term, is completely shameless about justifying itself through obfuscation---essentially, say "heteronormativity" is bad, and repeat "performative", "iterated", "queer theory" enough times that people respect you and your vacuity. This led me to believe that I had been far too circumspect in my values and my tactics visavis drug prohibition; if the queers are now at a point where they basically set the script _on their own terms_ in Universities, why should that not be the goal of the drug culture?
As an example, here on these forums there are many drug users who believe in "soberonormativity," at least for children, in that they believe a sober childhood is normal/optimal/better than a high childhood. Now, to my mind, this is more or less the equivalent of trying to teach children to be accepting of queers by telling them "you know, once you're an adult, if you want to be gay, that's one thing, maybe, I guess, but, gosh, try to kiss girls if you're a boy and boys if you're a girl while you're growing up---trust us, we're older and wiser." Yeah, right.
And, totally coincidentally, at this time I was given a bible, and I began to read it. Goodness gracious does it say some hip things---and I'm not going to argue for the truth/falsity of the Scriptures; I will point out that in every courtroom of British Columbia there is a copy, and that I've heard a Judge of the Provincial Court go so far as to say that he would not contradict anything in Scripture.
So, I thought "won't contradict anything in Scripture"? Ah, well then. The charter says, pretty much, that a Court may contradict any charter right insofar as that contradiction facilitates amelioration of the condition of a historically oppressed group, so Charter rights are right out, but what about Scriptural rights, I thought?
Anyway, at this time I was also reading Fortescue's Commendation of the Laws of England which details the rights and responsibilities of the Monarch, who at the time was in exile with Fortefcue. More or less, it says therein that the book of Deuteronomy is especially important to Monarchy, as it is in Deuteronomy that all of God's commandments are most explicitely and totally recounted; that is to say, the entire Scripture is a fountain of lifegiving water, but Deuteronomy is especially instructive for rulers.
I'd also been reading some very good Coke at the time, and Coke says animals are hurtful if single, as bears and foxes, but they are not hurtful if they are social, as sheep, fish, etc. So, from that, I gathered that one is required to have some society, that is, partnership. Thus I set to draughting a charter for a society that would use Deuteronomy, which Fortescue confirms is complete, and which the Lord Chancellor Ellesmere states is part of the foundation of the common law of england by way of his statement that the common law of England's ground is the law of God.
So, it appeared, and still appears to me, that in terms of Anglo-Christian legal heritage, drugs simply cannot be prohibited for free individuals, for the prohibition requires theft, and theft is of injuria, not jus, and the Monarch's power is that of jus, not injuria, for jus and injuria are mutually exclusive. And this is all outlined in the Society's Charter and various Acts of Parliament.
At this point we are "in medias res" the refining/firing of the creation---and what I find most dreadful is the lack of imagination on the part of people. It is very sad to me that I've had more respectful dialogue on this issue with Ed Fast, Conservative MP, than with the people here who supposedly want drugs legalized. In my view, anyone who wants to do something politically helpful should stay the hell away from the Socialists in the NDP and get in with the Conservatives...
"Is that Christian as in the ridiculously distorted from of Christianity the world has known...or the universal teachings of Jesus?"
Well, presuming you're not of the "Jesus is love! Love is a hallmark card!" persuasion,
"36For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
37Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
38Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels."
(from Mark 8)
The project really consists merely in not being ashamed of the Word of God, or holy scripture, especially the ten commandments, or Law called Moral.
"If it's the former, mixing religion and politics is a dangerous habit. I heard it leads to psychosis"
Well, considering that psychosis only exists because psychiatrists have voted it into being, I am just not so sure that anything can lead to psychosis, 'cept a duly authorized Quack being allowed to work out on some precious mind. Even though he's out of fashion, I think Szasz makes a good argument, and, no, I do not think that fancy coloured pictures of brains refute him at all. There is a fundamental epistemic problem associated with the diagnosis of mental illness, especially without the permission of the patient as is often the case for diagnoses of "psychosis." And it is generally self-fulfilling: "we do not need his permission because he is psychotic," and why is he psychotic? "He doesn't want to give us permission. He says we are cryptofascists, members of a monopolistic corporation called the College of Physicians and Surgeons. Clearly we need to pump him full of drugs until he forgets how our scam works..."
Given the responses in this thread and in general to these ideas when brought up in public, a lot of vicious laypeople of slightly above average intelligence (it's odd that less intelligent people and more intelligent people can often get it, tho the former can rarely repeat it coherently, they are good people and know they are free.) are perfectly at ease with labelling the holders of different political opinions with mental health terminology---of course, they're "reasonable persons", which is like a "reasonable man", which is taken to be "the man on the Clapham Omnibus," or someone just like them: a silly worker going to work, knowing all of the things that workers "know." Not someone dedicated to study, wisdom, etc...a mere worker, a bee for the beehive.
Now, we all know that in the Soviet Union they interred people under the guise of mental health problems for political dissent; and it is no surprise to me, for there is always a segment of the population so insecure in its views that they are only able to maintain them by coercive authority.
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Reflections on "Staying alive" Fifth Estate CBC
This might be the 3rd time I have seen the gripping documentary "Staying alive" by the CBC Fifth Estate. It is very close to me in both a physical and an emotional sense. As I go forth today with the White Wolf I will ponder on the first half of it. This documentary is so laden with human hurt that I have never been able to watch it all the way through at once. I know some of these people from seeing them on the street, others I know from a resemblance to people whom I know closely.
Last night the manager made me aware that the authorities are looking for my neighbor, Robert, who has serious mental health issues and is being actively sought. They are concerned, because he is missing with the weather getting cold.
When Robert first moved in I didn't realize that he was so seriously mentally disturbed. I even sold him small amounts of pot until I began to realize that he was incompetent. It has been a very long time since I have sold him anything, though he still asks. He had gotten on into my bad books when he began to talk of violent nonsense whenever we met. He had also begun to bring crack/meth/hard drug addicts by, speaking about what I do openly as he passed .
I mean, really! I don't spend much time worrying at the worst of times (I have 911 on speed dial and the white wolf to give me a few seconds of warning, so I am confident. The last time I relied totally on the cops they ended up siding with the attacker, so this time I will not rely on them) but that got me upset. I told the former manager to get in touch with those concerned about his well being.
He has been missing for lengthy periods before, so I thought perhaps he is in jail or institutionalized. All my former dark thoughts toward him have turned into reflective empathy with a tinge of guilt. I hope he is OK. I think he is harmless to others in a direct way, but incapable of living on his own. If he has been injured, or worse, it is the fault of the same heartless state which always finds the cops innocent.
I noticed on the documentary, shot also in cold weather, that there was a lack of housing to get those who desperately needed it, off the street. Today, only because of the Olympics, not empathy for the plight of the desperate, do we see that the cops have the power to forcibly remove people from the street "For health reasons" What kind of political bullshit is that?
Watching this documentary's first half put me in an emotional turmoil about the injustice of the mental health problems and emotional issues surrounding addictions and substance abuse being exacerbated by the Controlled drug and substances act and political entrenchment of police state tyranny.
THE WHOLE LEGAL CIRCUS OF JUDGES, LAWYERS COPS CAN SCREW WITH PEOPLE'S LIVES MAKING OUR COMMUNITIES LESS SAFE, BECAUSE WAY BACK WHEN A MISTAKE WAS MADE PLACING A MORAL JUDGMENT ON HUMAN ADDICTIONS/ILLNESS.
I think that today I will take a psychedelic journey in search of my neighbor on several plains of the metaphysical as well as the pragmatic. I will wander with the white wolf and talk to people and gather more social connections, a deeper emotional bonding with my fellow humans. Then I will return to watch the end of "Staying alive" and perhaps writing some more if the mood strikes me.
I hope that you will also have a deeply rewarding day, enhanced with new delightful, friendly and empathetic human connections, a happy widening of experience/understanding.
Here is some of the connectivity of life that I believe the internet can be used for.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Cpl. Benjamin Monty Robinson is a liar, cowardly & responsible for 2 deaths now



"Following a detailed analysis of the results of a comprehensive police investigation, the Criminal Justice Branch has concluded that no Criminal Code driving-related charged will be laid against Cpl. Robinson," said a statement from the branch.
The officer argued in B.C. Supreme Court in March that a motor vehicles adjudicator didn't properly consider his statement that he left the scene of the collision, had two shots of vodka, and then returned to the scene.
Robinson is scheduled to appear in court Dec. 8 on the obstruction charge.
This is my tribute to Orion done soon after his tragic death touched me. Here is the continuity to why I am out in front of the court house.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Season's greetings from the Unincorporated Deuteronomical Society
Here we are at that special time of the year! What better gift that keeps on giving could there be than a "Lawful Excuse?"
Come get 'em while the gettin's good!
I'll be handing them out along with my best wishes at the courthouse protest.
Court days 9am to 10am 222 Main Str Misery Mill Vancouver---rain or shine!
Come get 'em while the gettin's good!
I'll be handing them out along with my best wishes at the courthouse protest.
Court days 9am to 10am 222 Main Str Misery Mill Vancouver---rain or shine!
Saturday, November 28, 2009
Understanding is a two way street

Earlier during the protest on the 26 the sheriff who had led me into the courtroom and then out, reappeared and asked me again “Did you read Romans 13 like I told you?” As a matter of fact I have many times. I asked him if he had read Deuteronomy. Just the fact that he had no new quotes to demand I read, tells me that this is his only stock quotation and is about rendering unto the state/conform to his BS. This is only more control fed in via scripture the meaning of which is taken out of context or logically not a valid example of an analogy.
The remark flung back at me by a different sheriff in reply to the following remark by me is very telling of the wall blocking the two way traffic that is the foundation of all communication which reveals greater understanding to both parties. The sheriff, a young fellow, had come up and asked me if I was going to remain demonstrating in the morning or go back to afternoons. It seemed like an open attempt at communication, so I answered him honestly and in depth.
“I really, really like the morning time slot for the protest. It invigorates me, starts the day off right for me! Almost like doing a hit of MDMA! It lasts all day long, too!”
He had turned away as soon as I mentioned ecstasy, as if he didn’t wish to get any on him. He threw back over this terse statement as he walked, “I don’t want to know about that!” or “I don’t want to hear about that!” To me it means the same thing, “I don’t want to understand!”
If you wish to see how some people enjoy the effects of MDMA go to my video shot by myself while under the effects of a 60 milligram dose. There is nothing that I am doing during the shooting and the entire day, or, saying that would make me ashamed of as much as if I were doing the same while under the influence of alcohol of comparable dosage ratio, say 4 beers as compared to eight. If I drank four beers I would be very drunk (impaired had/eye coordination), loud and bordering on irrational. This would last about an hour and then a severe headache would set in to be a backdrop for a general feeling of malaise. There would be no motivation for me to do anything constructive, or even get off the couch.
Yet the sheriff sees MDMA as being illegal and believes that it is so because the government knows best and this is a dangerous, even deadly substance which must be kept from all people. This is the chasm that lies between us. We must each wish to cross it for acceptable knowledge to flow. I seek to understand his thinking and thereby find an opening for my understanding to be conveyed through opening up his understanding while at the same time he should be seeking to convince me of his understanding. If the goal is to achieve knowledge which expands one’s understanding then each must be open to receive it. The government blocks the path of enlightened exchange by implementing a fraud to control people’s perception.
This propaganda regime surrounding prohibition was started for different purposes than those to which it is put today. In the beginning the prohibitions act was brought into being as a cultural/moral exclusion tool, while through the last century it has evolved to become a political tool primarily. The moral issue has come to the foreground as being a valid plank of political parties strongly associated with law enforcement tinged campaigns. Although there is no valid scientific proof of any law enforcement campaign being able to control substances anywhere, still money is put down this endless hole building up police forces at the expense of social safety. Even in Saudi Arabia western residential foreigners brew alcohol, Arabs run speakeasies much the same as when the alcohol prohibition laws plagued America during the twenties, while the penalties are stiffer.
This sheriff who didn’t wish to hear that I felt as good after my daily protest as I did on a hit of MDMA is not reasoning, rather repeating a lie. The truth is that he believes a lie promoted by the government. Ecstasy is less harmful than alcohol, plain and simple. Regardless of what the government claims, the Fact is that anyone choosing ecstasy over alcohol in moderate amounts is making a safer choice. The deaths range in causes from poor information known by the user, to adulterated non pure drugs and occur less frequently than those caused by alcohol.
I have to understand that this sheriff isn’t so much against me, rather he is confused as to what is the truth, because he has been told a common lie which he believes. If he became aware of the truth he might begin to question other things coming from the same source. Reaching understanding, or gaining new knowledge is a continuing process, usually experienced as a side effect of life. At times it is sprinkled with little eureka moments, epiphanies to spice things up for us, otherwise we might loose interest in the long learning process.
I hope the young sheriff does as much thinking as I have on the matter and that we can bridge our differences, eventually, through intelligent respectful communication.
Hey, you never know!
Anyways it is good I take a couple of days off from the political crap and get on with more artistic pursuits for balance in my life. This kind of stuff adds much needed levity (comedic relief) in creative new ways to put into perspective my other passions.
Friday, November 27, 2009
When respect is given me, I give it back.
Although it seems like I am angry, I am not. And many of the personnel either nod a hello or say good morning. I respond with sincere good wishes back. There have been a couple of incidents with sheriffs and cops and even lawyers where we parted with mutual respect, today. Some cops understand that they should also be held to the same laws as everyone, they welcome civilian oversight. Some even want to see see the end of prohibition. Some lawyers are disgusted with the system and want to see changes. Many people who work here see the futility of drug prohibition and the increase in violent crime directly in response to our institutionalized idiocy. I am not against anyone personally but want people to understand my motivations and how sincere I am about my goals. I wish to convert people to our way of thinking. First you must tell them what many tens of thousands of Canadians think. I do this with as much respect for an individual that I can muster, while not holding back about the role they are playing serving the system. Everyday I GET THUMBS UP FROM MANY PEOPLE. Several have taken my picture and quite a few have taken my card. One cop went in today ranting the old fraud "Smoking pot fries your brains" in retort my question about why cops get away with murder. Yeah, fries them enough to see the lies, I guess. To this moron cop it a generally accepted thing that cops should be protected by insulting those that point out a deficiency in the application of justice. According to his way of thinking cops should be allowed to pervert the rule of law and used fraud to paint others in a negative light because they have no real answer as to why cops should be above the law.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
It's early Sunday morning and I can't sleep. Might as well write something. A close friend has lost her last parent and I wonder how that will hurt when it comes to me.
This protest at the courthouse must be done for the good of my community, as well as my own ethical core. Several times in my life the police and government have broken the rule of law. That is why I withdrew my consent to be governed and then formed a society.
I have felt so strong about the danger and crime around me, that I went so far as to appear before the Parliament of Canada to make my point as Chief Justice Bud the Oracle. I gave up all benefits from this criminal organization called Canada. Still, the rogue agents and police harass, assault, and treat me as a criminal under their control. All while they whitewash themselves of the latest TASER murder. Since I had that 10 minute session with Lester B Pearson, in 65 or so, in Thorold, and government became a grand concept, the reality of what Canada really is has shocked me. It's like waking up in a nightmare.
This Conservative government is corrupt, a blatant American imperialist boot polisher and has debased the entire spectrum of Canadian values. Harper seeks to install an American controlled police state by all measure. Not that the liberals were any better. 3 non electable creeps for leaders in a row now, shows us that the entire barrel has become rotten. They need an overhaul bad but the entrenched criminals are not inclined to let go of their last tenuous grip on power.
What disappoints me the most is the dullness of the entire spectrum of the citizenry. Having given up TV myself, I understand that it is the major cause of our collective idiocy. Besides promoting government/establishment fraud, this is a mind numbing time waster. In a democracy, if the people become too disengaged in their day to day governance, neglect their duty to remain assertively engaged to keep governments in check, tyranny will quickly seek to fill the unguarded void. This tyranny is pervasive and not even comprehended by the lower echelons who are hired from a dimwitted pool and given job security in return for perverting the law. This corruption cascades through the entire spectrum from judges to jailers, from politicians to cops. Soon all niches are filled with those actively or unwittingly supporting oppression. People who try to make a difference are denigrated and harassed for it. Every avenue for constructive change is blocked and the rule of law perverted.
What is a poor person with an ethical core to do if they do not wish to march with the Nazis? Maybe that is why any true change comes from violent revolution. The tyrants are too arrogant and wont allow the slightest spark of freedom to ignite anything remotely smelling of Justice.
Well, if these creeps get to send me to jail after I have created a legal out, a lawful excuse/claim of right for myself, perpetrate tyranny on me for the sake of quelling my peaceful liberty and promoting control and regulation for a safer community, I then will explore whatever other avenues might be necessary. Remaining with a criminal organization such as Canada which seeks to harm its harmless citizens over their choice of diet, is not a viable option for me. Come what may I am committed to my goals at any price. I am prepared to give my life for it.
Perhaps I made a mistake when I was being vetted for membership into organized crime. Surely, a guy with my talents, skills and fearlessness would get another chance to make up for my mistake.
What I do know is that as people are shunned from society, via oppression, they tend to gravitate to a like minded bunch. This is why there is rampant crime around prohibition. The hypocritical liars such as Rahim Jaffer and dumb sheep who believe them set up a situation where intelligent people who thirst for freedom, not nanny state uber control, are driven into associations where the laws of the tyrants no longer exist, or "criminal enterprises" as labeled by the oppressors. Those who participate in/support this forced free market simply because they feel that they have a right to choose their own diet, do so being otherwise law abiding citizens.
When 6 million people in a country of 30 million disregard a law, this decreases respect for all laws and sows the seeds of criminal gang violence with evidently abundant fertile results.
Saturday, November 21, 2009
222 Misery Mill Protest new hours 9am to 10 am
There is no "rule of law" in Canada, rather the cops get away with murder every time!
For trying to set an example of control and regulation to make my community safer, first the criminals attack us.
Then the cops get in on the action and illegally arrest Bud the Oracle under a false name. Then I am assaulted by 3 jail guards and made to perform in their Kangaroo courts against the law.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)